BEA v The King BEA v The King

[2024] HCASL 317

BEA

v

THE KING

BEA

v

THE KING

[2024] HCASL 317
B53/2024
B54/2024

1. In each of the applications, the applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland (Bradley J, Dalton JA and Gotterson A-JA agreeing), which dismissed an appeal against conviction following a jury trial and refused an application for leave to appeal against a sentence imposed on the applicant by the District Court of Queensland (Lynham DCJ).

2. There is insufficient reason to doubt the correctness of the judgment of the Court of Appeal. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant an extension of time.

3. Special leave to appeal is refused.

   Gleeson J
   Beech-Jones J

   5 December 2024