BBI (Review of Enduring Powers)

Case

[2017] TASGAB 18

23 November 2017


GUARDIANSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION BOARD
HOBART

BBI (REVIEW OF ENDURING GUARDIAN APPLICATION)

BBI (Review of Enduring Powers) [2017] TASGAB 18

REASONS FOR DECISION

Justin Otlowski (Chair)
Angela McKenzie (Member)
Matthew Fasnacht (Member)

Hearing 3 November 2017

Administration – continuation of Administration Order

  1. The Public Trustee was appointed administrator of the represented person BBI by order of the Board dated 6 November 2014.

  2. The Public Trustee has applied for a review of the existing Administration Order and is seeking an extension of its appointment for a period of three years.

  3. The Application was heard on the 3 November 2017.  Appearing at the Application were Edward Kempa on behalf of the Public Trustee and BBI.

  4. BBI made it very clear that she did not want the Public Trustee involved with her finances and she wanted to look after her own finances.

  5. A statement of accounts and a report was provided by the Public Trustee, it was prepared by Christine Ley and is dated 15 October 2017.  In that report Ms Ley claims that BBI continues to display poor insight into the need to budget for daily living requirements and that she does not understand that she cannot spend money that she does not earn.  Ms Ley was also concerned that BBI remains at risk of exploitation from other family members and in these circumstances the need for an Administration Order remains.

  6. The Board was provided with a health care professional report dated 1 November 2017 from Ms Claire Woolley who is BBI’s treating psychologist. 

  7. In that report Ms Woolley’s states that BBI has a mild intellectual disability and a borderline personality disorder.

  8. Ms Woolley was also of the opinion that BBI’s psychiatric disability results in her losing capacity to make decisions in time of stress making her increasingly vulnerable to dangerous decisions and undue influence.  Ms Woolley was also of the opinion that BBI requires support for complex decisions even when calm and that she was unable to make reasonable decisions if under significant stress which impacts on her mental health.  Ms Woolley stated that BBI needed support to budget for regular expenses.  Ms Woolley stated that if an Administrator is not appointed then BBI will likely incur significant debt, engage in risky financial decisions for example gambling, and would experience increased conflict and stress.

  9. The Board accepts the opinion of Ms Claire Woolley and is satisfied that despite BBI’s clear wishes that the Public Trustee not been appointed that she has a disability and cannot manage her finances and that she needs support to budget and manage her finances.  The Board orders that the Public Trustee be appointed BBI’s Administrator for a period of three years following the expiration of the current Administration Order.

Justin Otlowski  Matthew Fasnacht  Angela McKenzie
Chair  Member  Member

23 November 2017

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0