BBE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Case [2019] HCASL 23


BBE15

v

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION & ANOR

[2019] HCASL 23
B46/2018

  1. The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Australia in respect of which a previous application for special leave to appeal was refused by this Court on 12 October 2017.  The present application has no prospects of success.  For that reason, it would be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought by the applicant.  Special leave to appeal should be refused.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

S.J. Gageler
13 February 2019
P.A. Keane
Details
AGLC
BBE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCASL 23
Case
[2019] HCASL 23
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of BBE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, the applicant sought special leave to appeal against a decision of the Federal Court of Australia. The Federal Court had previously dismissed an application for special leave to appeal made by the applicant on 12 October 2017. The present application for special leave was made by the applicant to the High Court of Australia.

The legal issues before the court involved determining whether the applicant had prospects of success in the proposed appeal. The court was required to consider whether it was appropriate to grant an extension of time to the applicant for making the application and whether it would be futile to grant special leave to appeal. The court had to evaluate the circumstances of the case and assess the merits of the application.

The court found that the application had no prospects of success and that it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought by the applicant. The court held that the previous refusal of special leave to appeal by the High Court on 12 October 2017 indicated that the applicant's appeal would not have been successful. Therefore, the court decided to refuse the application for special leave to appeal.

The court further directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application with costs, pursuant to rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). This order was made on 13 February 2019 by S.J. Gageler.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.