BBE15
v
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION & ANOR
[2019] HCASL 23
B46/2018
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Australia in respect of which a previous application for special leave to appeal was refused by this Court on 12 October 2017. The present application has no prospects of success. For that reason, it would be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought by the applicant. Special leave to appeal should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.
S.J. Gageler
13 February 2019P.A. Keane
- AGLC
- BBE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCASL 23
- Case
- [2019] HCASL 23
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved determining whether the applicant had prospects of success in the proposed appeal. The court was required to consider whether it was appropriate to grant an extension of time to the applicant for making the application and whether it would be futile to grant special leave to appeal. The court had to evaluate the circumstances of the case and assess the merits of the application.
The court found that the application had no prospects of success and that it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought by the applicant. The court held that the previous refusal of special leave to appeal by the High Court on 12 October 2017 indicated that the applicant's appeal would not have been successful. Therefore, the court decided to refuse the application for special leave to appeal.
The court further directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application with costs, pursuant to rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). This order was made on 13 February 2019 by S.J. Gageler.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.