Baylden and Baylden and Anor

Case [2013] FCCA 1287


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BAYLDEN & BAYLDEN & ANOR [2013] FCCA 1287
Catchwords:
CHILD SUPPORT – Practice and procedure – review of Registrar’s decision.

Legislation:

Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth), s.111C

Applicant: MR BAYLDEN

First Respondent:

Second Respondent:

MS BAYLDEN

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR

File Number: SYC 2887 of 2013
Judgment of: Judge Scarlett
Hearing date: Decided in chambers
Date of Last Submission: 3 September 2013
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 3 September 2013

REPRESENTATION

The Applicant: In person
First Respondent: In person
Solicitors for the Second Respondent: Department of Human Services

ORDERS

  1. The Application in a Case filed on 27 August 2013 is to be listed on Tuesday 15 October 2013 at 10:00 am.

  2. The Application and affidavit in support must be served on the Respondents by 4 October 2013.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Baylden & Baylden & Anor is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT SYDNEY

SYC 2887 of 2013

MR BAYLDEN

Applicant

And

MS BAYLDEN

First Respondent

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR
Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Application

  1. This is an Application for review of a Registrar’s decision to list an Application in a Case on 12th November 2013. The Application has been listed on the same date as the Applicant’s Appeal against a decision of the Social Security Appeals Tribunal.

  2. However, the Application in a Case seeks a stay of enforcement of payments of child support until the Appeal is heard on condition that the Applicant continues to pay the sum of $400.00 per month by way of child support.

Consideration

  1. The Application seeks a stay as provided by s.111C of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth) and, not surprisingly, the Applicant wishes to have it heard promptly. It would be too late to leave the Application until the hearing date of the Appeal.

Conclusions

  1. The Application should be given a first return date on the next Child Support List date, which is Tuesday 15 October.

  2. I will order accordingly.

I certify that the preceding five (5) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Scarlett

Associate: 

Date:  6 September 2013

Details
AGLC
Baylden and Baylden and Anor [2013] FCCA 1287
Case
[2013] FCCA 1287
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application filed on 27 August 2013 by the applicant, Baylden, against the respondents, also named Baylden and another party. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but the court was required to make orders regarding the listing of the application and the service of documents. The decision was made by Judge Scarlett.

The primary legal issues before the court were the scheduling of the applicant's application and the timeframe for its service upon the respondents. The court needed to determine an appropriate date for the hearing of the application and establish a deadline by which the application and supporting affidavit were to be provided to the respondents.

In determining the orders, Judge Scarlett directed that the application be listed for hearing on Tuesday, 15 October 2013, at 10:00 am. Furthermore, the court ordered that the application and its supporting affidavit must be served on the respondents no later than 4 October 2013. These orders facilitated the progression of the legal proceedings by setting a clear timetable for the next steps.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The Application in a Case filed on 27 August 2013 is to be listed on Tuesday 15 October 2013 at 10:00 am.

2.

The Application and affidavit in support must be served on the Respondents by 4 October 2013.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.