Bavulo Pty Limited v Zhang Property Pty Limited
Case
•
[2024] NSWSC 879
•19 July 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bavulo Pty Limited v Zhang Property Pty Limited [2024] NSWSC 879
[2024] NSWSC 879
19 July 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Bavulo Pty Limited (the purchaser) sought a declaration that the sale of a property to Zhang Property Pty Limited (the vendor) be declared void. The purchaser argued that the vendor failed to serve a notice to complete, and therefore the sale should be void. The vendor claimed that the purchaser had not completed the sale in accordance with the contract, and that the vendor had the right to terminate the contract and retain the deposit. The dispute was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
The court needed to determine whether the vendor's failure to serve a notice to complete prevented the issuance of a valid notice, and whether the vendor's termination of the contract was valid. The court also needed to consider whether the vendor had breached the contract by failing to provide documentation and by not notifying the purchaser of a breach of lease.
The court found that the vendor's failure to serve a notice to complete prevented the issuance of a valid notice, and therefore the purchaser was not in default. The court also found that the vendor's termination of the contract was invalid because it was based on the purchaser's alleged failure to comply with a notice to complete that was never issued. The court further found that the vendor had breached the contract by failing to provide documentation and by not notifying the purchaser of a breach of lease. However, the court found that these breaches did not entitle the vendor to terminate the contract and retain the deposit. The court ordered the vendor to return the deposit to the purchaser.
The court ordered that the contract for sale of the property be declared void and that the vendor return the deposit to the purchaser. The court also ordered that the vendor pay the purchaser's costs of the proceeding.
The court needed to determine whether the vendor's failure to serve a notice to complete prevented the issuance of a valid notice, and whether the vendor's termination of the contract was valid. The court also needed to consider whether the vendor had breached the contract by failing to provide documentation and by not notifying the purchaser of a breach of lease.
The court found that the vendor's failure to serve a notice to complete prevented the issuance of a valid notice, and therefore the purchaser was not in default. The court also found that the vendor's termination of the contract was invalid because it was based on the purchaser's alleged failure to comply with a notice to complete that was never issued. The court further found that the vendor had breached the contract by failing to provide documentation and by not notifying the purchaser of a breach of lease. However, the court found that these breaches did not entitle the vendor to terminate the contract and retain the deposit. The court ordered the vendor to return the deposit to the purchaser.
The court ordered that the contract for sale of the property be declared void and that the vendor return the deposit to the purchaser. The court also ordered that the vendor pay the purchaser's costs of the proceeding.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Contract Formation
-
Breach of Contract
-
Specific Performance
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Bavulo Pty Limited v Zhang Property Pty Limited [2025] NSWCA 9
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Bavulo Pty Limited v Zhang Property Pty Limited
[2025] NSWCA 9
Bavulo Pty Limited v Zhang Property Pty Limited
[2025] NSWCA 9
Cases Cited
14
Statutory Material Cited
1
Barrak Corporation Pty Ltd v Jaswil Properties Pty Ltd
[2016] NSWCA 32
Carrapetta v Rado
[2012] NSWCA 202
Chandos Developments Pty Ltd v Mulkearns
[2008] NSWCA 62