FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bavistock v Macquarie Equities Limited [2008] FCA 1620
PETER BAVISTOCK, CHRIS BAVISTOCK, CLO INVESTMENTS PTY LTD, DONNA TURNBULL, JAMIE BOWDEN, ADAM BARNEY, VERA DUNAISKI, ROBERT HUTCHINGS and MARIA HUTCHINGS v MACQUARIE EQUITIES LIMITED ACN 002 574 923
VID 850 of 2008
GORDON J
23 OCTOBER 2008
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
VID 850 of 2008
BETWEEN: PETER BAVISTOCK
First ApplicantCHRIS BAVISTOCK
Second ApplicantCLO INVESTMENTS PTY LTD
Third ApplicantDONNA TURNBULL
Fourth ApplicantJAMIE BOWDEN
Fifth ApplicantADAM BARNEY
Sixth ApplicantVERA DUNAISKI
Seventh ApplicantROBERT HUTCHINGS
Eighth ApplicantMARIA HUTCHINGS
Ninth Applicant
AND: MACQUARIE EQUITIES LIMITED ACN 002 574 923
Respondent
JUDGE:
GORDON J
DATE OF ORDER:
23 OCTOBER 2008
WHERE MADE:
MELBOURNE
OTHER MATTERS:
The parties consent to the cross-vesting to the Federal Court of Australia, South Australian District Registry, proceedings numbered 1458, 1459 and 1478 of 2008 in the Supreme Court of South Australia, and proceedings numbered 1578, 1589, 1590 and 1603 of 2008 in the District Court of South Australia (“the South Australian proceedings”).
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The Respondent’s Notice of Motion dated 16 October 2008 be dismissed.
2.The Applicants’ application pursuant to Order 6 Rule 2(b) of the Federal Court Rules be adjourned to 2:30pm on 14 November 2008.
3.Pursuant to section 48 of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) and Order 10 Rule 1(2)(f) of the Federal Court Rules, the proceedings be transferred to the Federal Court of Australia, South Australian District Registry at Adelaide.
4.By no later than 7 November 2008:
a)the Respondent file and serve a defence;
b)the Applicants file and serve a defence to the South Australian proceedings.
5.The proceedings are adjourned for further directions before Justice Mansfield at 2:30pm on 14 November 2008.
6.Costs reserved.
7.Liberty to apply.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
VID 850 of 2008
BETWEEN: PETER BAVISTOCK
First ApplicantCHRIS BAVISTOCK
Second ApplicantCLO INVESTMENTS PTY LTD
Third ApplicantDONNA TURNBULL
Fourth ApplicantJAMIE BOWDEN
Fifth ApplicantADAM BARNEY
Sixth ApplicantVERA DUNAISKI
Seventh ApplicantROBERT HUTCHINGS
Eighth ApplicantMARIA HUTCHINGS
Ninth Applicant
AND: MACQUARIE EQUITIES LIMITED ACN 002 574 923
Respondent
JUDGE:
GORDON J
DATE:
23 OCTOBER 2008
PLACE:
MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This proceeding presented interesting questions of case management of multiple proceedings in multiple jurisdictions involving a number of the same parties and the same or similar issues of fact and law. On 10 October 2008, Peter Bavistock and a group of eight others filed an application and statement of claim in this Court against Macquarie Equities Ltd (“Macquarie”). In general terms, the applicants are clients of Macquarie who allege that Macquarie mishandled their money by, amongst other things, increasing the limits on the clients’ margin loan accounts and in engaging in high risk margin trades without the clients’…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Bavistock v Macquarie Equities Limited and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] FCA 1620
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with deciding several legal issues, including whether the conduct of Macquarie Equities Limited constituted misleading or deceptive conduct as per the Australian Consumer Law, and whether the applicant had the requisite standing to bring the proceedings. Furthermore, the court had to determine the appropriate venue for the proceedings and address procedural matters related to the filing and service of documents.
Justice Mansfield dismissed the Respondent's Notice of Motion dated 16 October 2008. The court adjourned the Applicants’ application pursuant to Order 6 Rule 2(b) of the Federal Court Rules to 2:30pm on 14 November 2008. The proceedings were transferred to the Federal Court of Australia, South Australian District Registry at Adelaide, in accordance with section 48 of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) and Order 10 Rule 1(2)(f) of the Federal Court Rules. The court mandated that the Respondent file and serve a defence by no later than 7 November 2008, and similarly required the Applicants to file and serve a defence to the South Australian proceedings by the same date. The proceedings were further adjourned for further directions before Justice Mansfield at 2:30pm on 14 November 2008, with costs reserved and liberty to apply.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The Respondent’s Notice of Motion dated 16 October 2008 be dismissed.
2. The Applicants’ application pursuant to Order 6 Rule 2(b) of the Federal Court Rules be adjourned to 2:30pm on 14 November 2008.
3. Pursuant to section 48 of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) and Order 10 Rule 1(2)(f) of the Federal Court Rules, the proceedings be transferred to the Federal Court of Australia, South Australian District Registry at Adelaide.
4. By no later than 7 November 2008:
a) the Respondent file and serve a defence;
b) the Applicants file and serve a defence to the South Australian proceedings.
5. The proceedings are adjourned for further directions before Justice Mansfield at 2:30pm on 14 November 2008.
6. Costs reserved.
7. Liberty to apply.
Note:
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.