Bashir & Ghani (No 3)
Case
•
[2021] FCCA 807
•23 April 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bashir and Ghani (No 3) [2021] FCCA 807
[2021] FCCA 807
23 April 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Bashir & Ghani (No 3)*, heard before Obradovic J, the applicant mother and respondent father were parties to proceedings concerning costs. The dispute revolved around the quantum of costs to be paid by the applicant to the respondent.
The central legal issue before the court was to determine the final amount of costs payable by the applicant mother to the respondent father. This determination was made in light of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), specifically referencing the prohibition on publishing proceedings that identify individuals involved in family law matters, suggesting that the proceedings themselves may have touched upon sensitive or identifying information.
The court ordered that the applicant mother pay the respondent father's costs in the sum of $23,284.90. This payment was to be made within a period of six months from the date of the order.
The central legal issue before the court was to determine the final amount of costs payable by the applicant mother to the respondent father. This determination was made in light of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), specifically referencing the prohibition on publishing proceedings that identify individuals involved in family law matters, suggesting that the proceedings themselves may have touched upon sensitive or identifying information.
The court ordered that the applicant mother pay the respondent father's costs in the sum of $23,284.90. This payment was to be made within a period of six months from the date of the order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Bashir and Ghani (No 3) [2021] FCCA 807
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
0
BASHIR & GHANI
[2017] FCCA 3448
Bashir & Ghani (No 2)
[2021] FCCA 253
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4