FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bashir & Ghani (No 3) [2021] FCCA 807
File number(s): PAC 4940 of 2016 Judgment of: JUDGE OBRADOVIC Date of judgment: 23 April 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Practice and Procedure – Costs – Application for costs on an indemnity basis – costs order made in accordance with scale. Legislation: Family Law Act 1975, s 117
Federal Circuit Court Rules2001, r 21.02, sch 1
Cases cited: Bashir & Ghani [2017] FCCA 3448
Bashir & Ghani (No.2) [2021] FCCA 253
Colgate Palmolive Co and Anor v Cussons Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 801
Collins & Collins [1985] FamCA 15
Penfold & Penfold [1980] HCA 4
Kohan & Kohan (1993) FLC 92-340
Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59Sala & Habner (No. 2) [2018] FCCA 2738
Wrensted & Eades [2016] FamCAFC 46
Number of paragraphs: 32 Date of last submission/s: 31 March 2021 Date of hearing: On the papers Place: Parramatta Solicitors for the Applicant Fay Rose Legal Counsel for the Respondent Mr Leidermann Solicitors for the Respondent Falzon Legal Pty Ltd ORDERS
PAC 4940 of 2016 BETWEEN: MS BASHIR
Applicant
AND: MR GHANI
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE OBRADOVIC
DATE OF ORDER:
23 APRIL 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The Applicant mother pay the Respondent father’s costs in the amount of $23,284.90 within 6 months.
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Bashir & Ghani (No 3) is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
JUDGE OBRADOVIC
On 22 November 2017, final parenting orders were made with respect to the parties’ two children, X born in 2012 and Y born in 2015, (“final parenting orders”). The final parenting orders provided for:
a.The father to have sole parental responsibility for the children;
b.The children to live with the father; and
c.The children to be permitted to travel internationally without the need for the consent of the mother to be provided to the issue of a passport for the children.
The final parenting orders were made in circumstances where the mother did not participate at final hearing and in her absence. Reasons for judgement were delivered ex tempore (but subsequently published): Bashir & Ghani [2017] FCCA 3448.
On 25 June 2020, the mother commenced fresh proceedings for parenting orders. On 7 December 2020, the father filed a response seeking orders dismissing the mother’s application and for costs. The matter proceeded to hearing on the Rice & Asplund issue on 5 February 2021.
On 17 February 2021, the Court delivered its reasons and dismissed the mother’s Initiating Application filed 25 June 2020: Bashir & Ghani (No.2) [2021] FCCA 253. After the orders were made, the father advised the Court that he pressed his application for costs, and procedural orders were then made…
Continue reading Bashir & Ghani (No 3)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Bashir and Ghani (No 3) [2021] FCCA 807
- Case
- [2021] FCCA 807
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was to determine the final amount of costs payable by the applicant mother to the respondent father. This determination was made in light of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), specifically referencing the prohibition on publishing proceedings that identify individuals involved in family law matters, suggesting that the proceedings themselves may have touched upon sensitive or identifying information.
The court ordered that the applicant mother pay the respondent father's costs in the sum of $23,284.90. This payment was to be made within a period of six months from the date of the order.
Orders
Orders of the court
PAC 4940 of 2016
BETWEEN:
MS BASHIR
Applicant
AND:
MR GHANI
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE OBRADOVIC
DATE OF ORDER:
23 APRIL 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Applicant mother pay the Respondent father’s costs in the amount of $23,284.90 within 6 months.
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.