Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. T/A Barrett Burston Malting Co Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWCA 1881


[2022] FWCA 1881

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. T/A Barrett Burston Malting Co Pty Ltd

(AG2022/1456)

Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. (Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2020

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 8 JUNE 2022

Application for approval of the Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. (Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2020

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. (Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. T/A Barrett Burston Malting Co Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Breweries and Bottleyards Employees' Industrial Union of Workers of Western Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Employer states that it notified the relevant employees of the voting details on 26 April 2022. Question 25 on the Form F17 indicates that the date that voting for the Agreement commenced was 28 April 2022. Therefore the 7-day access period started on the first full day after 20 April 2022. As such, the employer did not notify the relevant employees of the voting details by the start of the access period in accordance with s.180(3) of the Act. The employer provided submissions in relation to this issue. The submissions outlined the circumstances which led to the error, supported by a statutory declaration made by Ms Rachel Zeliff, Director of Human Resources. In relation to the discretion conferred under s.188(2), the employer made the following submissions:

“The Company submits that the Commission can be satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed to by the employees having regard to the circumstances set out above, including because the employees had an active union representing them throughout the bargaining process, that the employees had been provided with a copy of the Agreement well in advance of the voting date, and where all of the employees attended the vote on 28 April 2022.

Furthermore, the Company submits that the employees covered by the Agreement are not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error but there would be substantial inconvenience to the Company and employees if the Agreement is not approved by the Commission as a further vote of the Agreement will need to take place.”

  1. Furthermore, I note that at the time of the vote, 7 employees were covered by the Agreement, and all 7 employees cast a valid vote. In the circumstances and having regard to the submissions of the employer and the decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others,[1] I am satisfied that this constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purpose of s.188(2)(a). Further, I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to be disadvantaged by the error.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 15 June 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2023.

COMMISSIONER

Annexure A


[1] [2019] FWCFB 318.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE516209  PR742443>

Details
AGLC
Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. T/A Barrett Burston Malting Co Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1881
Case
[2022] FWCA 1881
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent case, Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. T/A Barrett Burston Malting Co Pty Ltd applied for the approval of the Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. (Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2020. The application was made under the Fair Work Act 2009 and involved the dispute over the terms and conditions of employment for workers at the company, particularly focusing on the agreement's provisions concerning wages, working hours, and other employment-related matters. The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission, which has jurisdiction to approve, reject, or vary enterprise agreements to ensure they meet the requirements of the Act.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements and whether it was made in good faith and without coercion. The Commission had to examine the negotiation process, the provisions of the agreement, and ensure it met the criteria for "better off overall" and "no disadvantage" tests, as well as considering the impact of the agreement on employees' conditions of employment. Additionally, the Commission needed to assess if the agreement contained appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement largely complied with the statutory requirements. The Commission considered the evidence presented by the parties and noted the thoroughness of the negotiation process. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair terms and conditions, including provisions for wages, working hours, and other employment matters, and that it was made in good faith. The Commission also found that the agreement met the "better off overall" and "no disadvantage" tests and contained adequate dispute resolution mechanisms. Therefore, the Commission approved the Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. (Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2020.

As a result of the decision, the enterprise agreement was approved, and its terms and conditions became binding on the parties. This outcome ensures that the workers at Barrett Burston Malting Co. Pty. Ltd. are covered by an agreement that provides for their fair treatment in the workplace, in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.