Barone (Migration) [2023] AATA 3649 (13 October 2023)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Riccardo Barone
CASE NUMBER: 2013049
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2018/3152142
MEMBER:Antonio Dronjic
DATE:13 October 2023
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Distinguished Talent (Residence) (Class BX) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the criteria in cl 858.212 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Statement made on 13 October 2023 at 2:35pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Distinguished Talent (Residence) (Class BX) visas – Subclass 858 (Distinguished Talent) – internationally recognised record of exceptional and outstanding achievement in the arts – pianist and composer – international composition competition winner – international festival performances and compositions for films – employment in Australia – relevant qualifications – still prominent – asset to the Australian community – decision under review remitted
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 359
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 858.212CASES
Gaffar v MIMA [2000] FCA 293
Prabhakaran v MICMA [2023] FedCFamC2G 357
Re Drake and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (No 2) (1979) 2 ALD 634
Springs v MICMSMA [2020] FCCA 371
Vishnumolakala v Minister for Immigration [2006] FMCA 1209
Zhang v MIMA [2007] FMCA 664STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 5 August 2020 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Distinguished Talent (Residence) (Class BX) Subclass 858 visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).
The visa applicant applied for the visa on 21 August 2018. The delegate refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not meet the requirements of cl 858.212 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
The applicant applied to the Tribunal on 20 August 2020, for review of the delegate’s decision. The applicant submitted a copy of the primary decision record with the review application.
The Tribunal noted the Department’s uploaded unrelated electronic file and, on several occasions, requested the Department submit a copy of its file related to Mr Barone’s application for a Subclass 858 visa. As of the day of this decision, the Department has failed to do so.
On 21 August 2023, the Tribunal wrote to the applicant pursuant to s 359(2) of the Act. The letter invited the applicant to provide information in writing that will demonstrate the applicant meets all of the requirements of cl 858.212 of the Regulations.
On 4 September 2023, the applicant submitted documentary evidence and submissions. The list of documents submitted to the Tribunal is attached to this decision record as Attachment A. On 18 September 2023, the applicant submitted a bundle of notes relating to his work in music.
According to the primary decision record, the applicant has been nominated for the visa by Australian citizen Mr Sankey Thomas Gene. He did not attend the hearing. The applicant is…
Continue reading Barone (Migration)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Barone (Migration) [2023] AATA 3649
- Case
- [2023] AATA 3649
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal was required to determine if Mr. Barone possessed an internationally recognised record of exceptional and outstanding achievement in the arts, if he remained prominent in his field, and if he would be an asset to the Australian community. The Tribunal also considered the interpretation of the timing of these criteria, referencing the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia decision in *Prabhakaran v MICMA* which held that criteria under clause 858.212 were not exclusively time-of-application matters and allowed for consideration of circumstances arising between application and decision.
The Tribunal reasoned that the applicant's extensive evidence, including numerous letters of support from various artistic and community organisations, academic qualifications, competition wins, and performances for films, demonstrated an internationally recognised record of exceptional and outstanding achievement in the arts. The Tribunal concluded that Mr. Barone met all applicable requirements under clause 858.212(2).
Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the application for a Distinguished Talent (Residence) (Class BX) visa for reconsideration, with a direction that Mr. Barone meets the criteria in clause 858.212 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.