| [2021] FWCA 4921 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Barnwell Cambridge Pty Ltd
(AG2021/6496)
BARNWELL CAMBRIDGE PTY LTD & ETU SYDNEY CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 10 AUGUST 2021 |
Application for approval of the Barnwell Cambridge Pty Ltd & ETU Sydney Construction Enterprise Agreement 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Barnwell Cambridge Pty Ltd & ETU Sydney Construction Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Barnwell Cambridge Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 August 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE512686 PR732698>
- AGLC
- Barnwell Cambridge Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 4921
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 4921
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the statutory provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly in relation to the protections it afforded to employees. This included assessing whether the agreement met the "better off overall test" which requires that employees be no worse off financially than under the applicable award or registered agreement, and whether the agreement contained minimum terms and conditions that aligned with the Act's objectives.
The Fair Work Commission found that while the proposed agreement contained many positive provisions, it did not adequately protect workers in certain areas, particularly regarding entitlements to paid leave and redundancy payments. The Commission concluded that the agreement failed the better off overall test and did not meet the minimum terms and conditions required by the Act. As a result, the Commission did not approve the proposed agreement.
The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide fair and adequate protections for employees. It noted that while the agreement contained some beneficial provisions, it was ultimately insufficient in key areas. The Commission's decision highlights the need for careful scrutiny of enterprise agreements to ensure compliance with the statutory framework and the protection of workers' rights.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.