Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
1
-
Freeman v Dillon
[2012] NSWLEC 1057
Citation 1
(Para 1)
…Trees do not cause fire but are damaged by fires caused by other things. The risk of fire damage is discussed in Freeman v Dillon [2012] NSWLEC 1057 at [86].…
-
Smith & Hannaford v Zhang & Zhou
[2011] NSWLEC 29
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…The level of satisfaction required by s 10(2) is discussed in Smith & Hannaford v Zhang & Zhou [2011] NSWLEC 29. At [62] Craig J states in part "something more than a theoretical possibility is required in order to engage the power under [the Trees] Act...".…
-
Hendry & anor v Olsson & anor
[2010] NSWLEC 1302
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…In Hendry & anor v Olsson & anor [2010] NSWLEC 1302, at [11]-[14], the Principle was extended to include the cleaning of mould and slime.…
-
Robson v Leischke
[2008] NSWLEC 152
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…In Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152; (2008) LGERA 280 Preston CJ at paragraphs [168] to [173] discusses 'damage' in general. In this discussion, his Honour specifically noted at [171] that:…
-
Yang v Scerri
[2007] NSWLEC 592
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…As the applicant is concerned about future damage, the guidance decision in Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 has determined that the 'near future' is a period of 12 months from the date of the hearing. In regards to injury, the Court considers the risk posed by a tree in the foreseeable future based on the characteri…
-
Barker v Kyriakides
[2007] NSWLEC 292
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…ropping of leaves, fruit, twigs and other material naturally shed from trees. The Court has published a Tree Dispute Principle in Barker v Kryiakides [2007] NSWLEC 292 which states that:…