Barker and Barker and Anor

Link copied
Case Copied 23 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BARKER & BARKER AND ANOR [2018] FamCA 692
FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Best interests of the child – Parental responsibility – Where both the mother and the father have disengaged from the proceedings – Where the mother is a perpetrator of family violence – Where concerns are raised in regards to the drug use of both parents – Where the child has been exposed to possible sexual abuse while in the care of the father – Where it is in the best interests of the child to live with the maternal grandmother – Where it is appropriate for no orders to be made for the child to spend time with either parent – Orders made. 
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60B, 60CA, 60CC, 61B, 61C, 61DA, 69ZN

Donnell & Dovey [2010] FAMCAFC 15
Jarrah & Fadel [2014] FamCAFC 14
G & C [2006] FamCA 994
Mazorski & Albright (2007) Fam LR 518
McCall & Clark (2009) FLC 93-405; 41 Fam LR 483; [2009] FamCAFC 92

APPLICANT: Ms A Barker
FIRST RESPONDENT: Ms B Barker
SECOND RESPONDENT: Mr Perkins
FILE NUMBER: PAC 2929 of 2017
DATE DELIVERED: 7 September 2018
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Hannam J
HEARING DATE: 19 July 2018

REPRESENTATION

SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Dignan and Hanrahan Solicitors and Attorneys
FIRST RESPONDENT: No appearance by or for the First Respondent
SECOND RESPONDENT: No appearance by or for the Second Respondent
COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Mr Maddox of Counsel
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Stanfords Solicitors and Conveyors

Orders

  1. The Applicant maternal grandmother have sole parental responsibility for the child X born … 2014 (“the child”).

  2. The child live with the Applicant maternal grandmother.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Barker & Barker and Anor has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA

FILE NUMBER: PAC2929 of 2017

Ms A Barker

Applicant

And

Ms B Barker

First Respondent

And

Mr Perkins
Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. These proceedings concern the long term parenting arrangements in respect of four year old X, the child of Ms B Barker (“the mother”) and Mr Perkins (“the father”).

  2. Following the parents’ separation on a final basis in March 2016 the mother and the child moved into the maternal grandmother’s home and the child spent regular time with the father under an informal arrangement.

  3. The maternal grandmother initiated these proceedings in the Federal Circuit Court (“FCC”) in June 2017. They were…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Barker and Barker and Anor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FamCA 692
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Barker and Barker and Anor*, heard by Hannam J, the applicant maternal grandmother sought sole parental responsibility and a residence order for the child, X. The precise nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but the orders indicate a contest concerning the child's upbringing and living arrangements.

The central legal issue before the court was to determine the best interests of the child, X, in circumstances where the maternal grandmother was seeking to be granted sole parental responsibility and for the child to live with her. This required the court to consider all relevant factors under the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) to ascertain what arrangement would best serve the child's welfare.

Hannam J ordered that the applicant maternal grandmother have sole parental responsibility for the child and that the child live with her. These orders reflect the court's determination that such arrangements were in the child's best interests, although the specific reasoning and the factors that led to this conclusion are not elaborated upon in the provided extract.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The Applicant maternal grandmother have sole parental responsibility for the child X born … 2014 (“the child”).

2.

The child live with the Applicant maternal grandmother.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.