Barina Corporation Ltd v The Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

Case

[1985] FCA 151

22 APRIL 1985


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Barina Corporation Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1985] FCA 151 ((1985) 59 ALR 401; (1985) 85 ATC 4186; (1985) 6 FCR 368) [1985] FCA 151 22 APRIL 1985

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Barina Corporation Ltd, sought an extension of time to lodge a notice of appeal against an income tax assessment made by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation. The application was brought before the court, which was required to determine whether the respondent had erred in law by not being satisfied that the applicant could not pay the assessed tax. The court was also tasked with considering the relevance of the applicant’s liquidity and prospects of success in the appeal in determining the assessment of additional tax.

The primary issue before the court was whether the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation had erred in concluding that he was not satisfied as to the applicant's inability to pay the assessed tax. The court examined the relevant statutory provisions and case law to determine the correct legal test for assessing an application for an extension of time to lodge an appeal. The court found that the Deputy Commissioner had applied the correct legal test and that there was no error of law. The court further held that the applicant's liquidity and prospects of success in the appeal were relevant factors to be considered in determining whether the applicant was unable to pay the assessed tax.

In dismissing the application for an extension of time, the court found that the Deputy Commissioner had not erred in concluding that he was not satisfied as to the applicant's inability to pay the assessed tax. The court held that the applicant had not demonstrated that it was unable to pay the assessed tax and that the applicant's liquidity and prospects of success in the appeal were relevant factors in making this determination. The court also found that the calculation of additional tax was appropriate. The court ordered that the application be dismissed and that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. The exhibits were to be handed out at the expiration of 21 days unless a Notice of Appeal was filed in the meantime.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Taxation Law

Legal Concepts

  • Limitation Periods

  • Costs

  • Assessment