Barbieri & Barbieri (No 2)

Case [2025] FedCFamC1A 89


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 1) APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Barbieri & Barbieri (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC1A 89

Appeal from: Barbieri & Barbieri (No 2) [2024] FedCFamC1F 686
Appeal number: NAA 322 of 2024
File number: SYC 6804 of 2020
Judgment of: MCCLELLAND DCJ, WILSON & JARRETT JJ
Date of judgment: 10 June 2025
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – APPEAL – COSTS – Application for costs on indemnity basis or otherwise at scale – Where the appellant was wholly unsuccessful – Where the appeal was not hopeless, without reasonable cause, frivolous or vexatious – Respondent awarded costs at scale.
Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 79A, 117
Cases cited:

Barbieri & Barbieri [2025] FedCFamC1A 51

Barbieri & Barbieri (No 2) [2024] FedCFamC1F 686

Browne v Green (2002) FLC 93-115; [2002] FamCA 791

Kelly and Kelly (No 2)(1981) 7 FamLR 762; [1981] FamCA 78

Penfold v Penfold (1980) 144 CLR 311; [1980] HCA 4

Trask & Westlake (Costs) [2015] FamCAFC 214

Warne v ACN 603 541 411 Pty Ltd (No 2) [2025] NSWCA 92

Number of paragraphs: 16
Date of last submission: 5 May 2025
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Place: In Chambers
Solicitor for the Appellant: Russell Kennedy
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Sirtes SC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Edwards Maloney Family Law

ORDERS

NAA 322 of 2024
SYC 6804 of 2020

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DIVISION 1 APPELLATE JURISDICTION

BETWEEN:

MR BARBIERI

Appellant

AND:

MS BARBIERI

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

MCCLELLAND DCJ, WILSON & JARRETT JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

10 JUNE 2025

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The appellant pay the respondent’s costs of and incidental to Appeal NAA 322 of 2024 fixed in the sum of $63,777.

Note:   The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Part XIVB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish an account of proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Barbieri & Barbieri has been approved pursuant to subsection 114Q(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

MCCLELLAND DCJ, WILSON & JARRETT JJ:

  1. By orders made on 31 March 2025, we dismissed the appellant’s appeal against certain property adjustment orders made by a judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) on 1 November 2024. We made directions about the filing and service of submissions, should any party be moved to seek an order as to the costs of the appeal.

  2. The respondent…

Continue reading Barbieri & Barbieri (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Barbieri & Barbieri (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC1A 89
Case
[2025] FedCFamC1A 89
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Barbieri & Barbieri (No 2) involved Mr Barbieri, the appellant, and Ms Barbieri, the respondent, who were before the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia in its appellate jurisdiction. The central issue in this appeal was the allocation of costs. Mr Barbieri sought to challenge the costs awarded to Ms Barbieri from the initial proceedings. The appeal was assessed on whether the costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis, or otherwise at scale.

The court was tasked with determining whether the appeal was hopeless, without reasonable cause, frivolous or vexatious, as these factors influence the discretion of the court in awarding costs. The court found that the appeal was neither hopeless nor without reasonable cause, and it was not frivolous or vexatious. Consequently, the court awarded costs to the respondent at scale rather than on an indemnity basis.

The court's decision was based on the appellant's lack of success in the appeal and the reasonable nature of the appeal's grounds. The court held that while the appeal was not entirely without merit, the appellant's overall failure justified the imposition of costs at scale. This was a proportionate outcome considering the appellant's unsuccessful appeal and the absence of egregious conduct warranting indemnity costs.

The court ordered that Mr Barbieri pay Ms Barbieri's costs of and incidental to the appeal NAA 322 of 2024, fixed in the sum of $63,777. This order reflects the court's balancing of the need to discourage frivolous appeals while also recognising the reasonable basis of the appeal in this instance.

Orders

Orders of the court

NAA 322 of 2024

SYC 6804 of 2020

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

DIVISION 1 APPELLATE JURISDICTION

BETWEEN:

MR BARBIERI

Appellant

AND:

MS BARBIERI

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

MCCLELLAND DCJ, WILSON & JARRETT JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

10 JUNE 2025

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The appellant pay the respondent’s costs of and incidental to Appeal NAA 322 of 2024 fixed in the sum of $63,777.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Part XIVB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish an account of proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.