Bar-Mordecai v Hillston
[2005] HCATrans 82
[2005] HCATrans 082
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S145 of 2004
B e t w e e n -
MICHAEL BAR-MORDECAI
Applicant
and
ALLAN HILLSTON
Respondent
Application for special leave to appeal
Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders
McHUGH J
HEYDON J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 3 MARCH 2005, AT 9.41 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
McHUGH J: On 28 February 2003, Bryson J made orders for the restoration of benefits worth over $3 million received by the applicant from a patient of his, now deceased, to her estate. This is an application for special leave to appeal from orders of the New South Wales Court of Appeal in part dismissing the applicant's appeal from the orders of Bryson J.
If special leave were granted, the appeal would require analysis of financial transactions and of other relations between the applicant and his patient going back nearly 20 years. Two courts have already conducted this analysis. There is no reason to think that the Court of Appeal's conclusions are wrong or that the applicant's allegations of a denial of natural justice and other procedural errors have any merit. There is no point in the application that would justify this Court granting special leave.
The application for special leave is dismissed with costs.
Pursuant to rule 41.11.1 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order that the application is dismissed with costs.
AT 9.41 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Causation
-
Damages
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Reliance
1
0
0