Baptcare Limited Trading AS Baptcare

Case [2025] FWCA 1679


[2025] FWCA 1679

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Baptcare Limited Trading AS Baptcare

(AG2025/1334)

BAPTCARE KARINGAL COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Aged care industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'NEILL

MELBOURNE, 20 MAY 2025

Application for approval of the Baptcare Karingal Community Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Baptcare Karingal Community Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Baptcare Limited Trading AS Baptcare. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.

  1. The Notice of Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees is a pre-6 June 2023 reforms version. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor technical departure from the NERR requirements under s.174 of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this error. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·           Clause 37.1 of the Agreement, providing for annual leave, which states that a full-time employee will be entitled to four weeks of annual leave after 12 months continuous service, inconsistent with s87 of the Act, providing for four weeks of annual leave for each year of service.

·           Clause 37.3 of the Agreement, which provides that shiftworkers are entitled to an additional week of annual leave after 12 months services, inconsistent with s.87 of the Act.

However, noting clause 4 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Health Services Union, Tasmania Branch, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 27 May 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2026.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE529079  PR787463>

Details
AGLC
Baptcare Limited Trading AS Baptcare [2025] FWCA 1679
Case
[2025] FWCA 1679
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Baptcare Limited Trading as Baptcare applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Baptcare Karingal Community Enterprise Agreement 2024. The application was opposed by the Australian Services Union. The dispute centered around the terms and conditions outlined in the proposed agreement, specifically the union's objections to certain provisions regarding wages, conditions, and other employment matters. The Fair Work Commission was required to determine whether the agreement met the legal standards for enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was in the best interests of the employees.

The Commission examined the agreement to ascertain if it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including provisions for good faith bargaining, coverage of the agreement, and the inclusion of minimum entitlements. The Commission also assessed whether the agreement was bona fide and whether it contained provisions that were in the best interests of the employees. The union's opposition focused on the assertion that the proposed agreement did not adequately protect the employees' interests, particularly in terms of wages and conditions.

The Commission found that the proposed agreement was bona fide and met the legal standards under the Fair Work Act. The Commission also determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, taking into consideration the overall benefits and protections provided. The objections raised by the union were not sufficient to outweigh the benefits of the agreement for the employees. As a result, the Commission approved the Baptcare Karingal Community Enterprise Agreement 2024.

The Commission's final orders included the approval of the Baptcare Karingal Community Enterprise Agreement 2024, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission and would govern the employment terms and conditions of the employees covered by the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.