FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| BANKS & LOFFLER | [2015] FamCA 380 |
| FAMILY LAW – EVIDENCE – Harman Undertaking – where father seeks to use material filed in these proceedings in his criminal proceedings – where no objection taken by mother – orders made allowing the release of affidavit and subpoena material for limited purpose. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 121 |
| Hearne & Street (2008) 235 CLR 125 |
| APPLICANT: | Mr Banks |
| RESPONDENTS: | Ms Loffler |
| FILE NUMBER: | ADC | 2014 | of | 2014 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 14 May 2015 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Adelaide |
| PLACE HEARD: | Adelaide |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Dawe J |
| HEARING DATE: | 14 May 2015 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Idema |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | D’Angelo Kavanagh |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mr B |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | John Charles Mattner |
Orders
The applicant be permitted to provide copies of the following documents to the Director of Public Prosecutions, his criminal law barristers and solicitors, South Australian Police and the District Court of South Australia:
(a)The mother’s Response filed 5 September 2014;
(b)The mother’s Affidavit filed 5 September 2014;
(c) The Affidavit of John Charles Mattner filed 5 September 2014;
(d)The Notice of Risk filed 5 September 2014 by the mother;
(e)The subpoena material listed as items S6 and S10 PROVIDED THAT does not include the confidential material in S10.
The release of copies of all documents is restricted to and limited for use by the applicant father’s barristers and solicitors, the Director of Public Prosecutions, South Australian Police and the District Court of South Australia for the criminal proceedings filed against the applicant father.
The father’s Application in a Case filed on 17 March 2015 is dismissed and removed from the active pending cases list.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Banks & Loffler has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT ADELAIDE |
FILE NUMBER: ADC 2014 of 2014
| Mr Banks |
Applicant
And
| Ms Loffler |
Respondent
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
I am being asked to make orders this morning in relation to the release of material which has been filed by the mother and other party in these proceedings which relate to the care and welfare of one of the children of the mother and father and proceedings between the father, mother and grandmother of the child.
The father is currently facing criminal proceedings in relation to another child, significant criminal proceedings which are to be heard in the District Court in July 2015. I am being asked now by the father to give him permission to use documents filed in the Family Court of Australia proceedings in his defence of the criminal proceedings.
The application originally referred to section 121 and being released from the same, but counsel appropriately indicated that he was not now relying upon section 121 but seeking a release of the information pursuant to the Court’s power to release the parties from what has in…
Continue reading BANKS & LOFFLER
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- BANKS & LOFFLER [2015] FamCA 380
- Case
- [2015] FamCA 380
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court was whether to grant permission for the disclosure of these documents, and if so, under what conditions. This involved balancing the father's need to use the documents for his defence in the criminal proceedings against potential privacy concerns or restrictions on the use of such documents. The Court also had to determine the fate of the father's separate application filed on 17 March 2015.
Dawe J reasoned that the disclosure of specific documents, including the mother's Response and Affidavit of 5 September 2014, the Affidavit of John Charles Mattner of 5 September 2014, the Notice of Risk filed by the mother on 5 September 2014, and certain subpoena material (excluding confidential material from item S10), was permissible. This permission was expressly limited to use by the father's legal representatives, the Director of Public Prosecutions, South Australian Police, and the District Court of South Australia, solely for the purpose of the criminal proceedings against the father. The Court also ordered that the father's Application in a Case filed on 17 March 2015 be dismissed and removed from the active pending cases list.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The applicant be permitted to provide copies of the following documents to the Director of Public Prosecutions, his criminal law barristers and solicitors, South Australian Police and the District Court of South Australia:
(a) The mother’s Response filed 5 September 2014;
(b) The mother’s Affidavit filed 5 September 2014;
(c) The Affidavit of John Charles Mattner filed 5 September 2014;
(d) The Notice of Risk filed 5 September 2014 by the mother;
(e) The subpoena material listed as items S6 and S10 PROVIDED THAT does not include the confidential material in S10.
2.
The release of copies of all documents is restricted to and limited for use by the applicant father’s barristers and solicitors, the Director of Public Prosecutions, South Australian Police and the District Court of South Australia for the criminal proceedings filed against the applicant father.
3.
The father’s Application in a Case filed on 17 March 2015 is dismissed and removed from the active pending cases list.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.