| [2017] FWCA 4222 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Bank of Queensland Limited T/A BOQ
(AG2017/3402)
BOQ ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Banking finance and insurance industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 15 AUGUST 2017 |
Variation of the BOQ Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] On 10 August 2017, Bank of Queensland Limited T/A BOQ (the applicant) filed an application under s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) for approval of a variation to the BOQ Enterprise Agreement 2014. The variation affects cls 4.1, 14.2(d), 14.2(e) and 14.2(f), and Schedule 2.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The application is approved. For the purpose of s.216 of the Act, the variation will operate from the date of this decision. Following the variation, I note the new nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2018.
[4] A consolidated version of the Agreement as varied is issued with this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE414061 PR595328>
- AGLC
- Bank of Queensland Limited T/A BOQ [2017] FWCA 4222
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 4222
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed variations to the enterprise agreement were genuinely intended to facilitate a better business outcome for BOQ and whether the changes were fair and reasonable in all the circumstances. The Commission had to assess whether the proposed variations were within the scope of permissible changes under the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether they adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining and procedural fairness. Additionally, the Commission needed to consider the impact of the proposed changes on the employees and whether any adverse effects could be mitigated.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed variations were genuinely intended to achieve a better business outcome for BOQ and were procedurally fair. The Commission acknowledged that the changes were necessary for BOQ to adapt to the evolving financial landscape and maintain competitiveness. The Commission also determined that the variations did not unfairly disadvantage the employees and were within the bounds of good faith bargaining. The changes were held to be fair and reasonable, and the Commission approved the proposed variations to the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.