[2013] FWCA 7410 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald
(AG2013/9540)
BAMBI CHILD CARE CENTRE - FITZGERALD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Children’s services | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 26 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 3 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE404341 PR542452>
- AGLC
- Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald [2013] FWCA 7410
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7410
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it complied with the relevant statutory requirements. Specifically, the court had to determine if the agreement was made in good faith, if it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and if the process leading to its creation was fair and transparent.
The court found that the agreement was indeed the product of genuine negotiation and met all statutory requirements. The evidence presented indicated that the negotiation process was conducted in good faith, with both parties making efforts to reach a consensus. The agreement contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions stipulated by the Fair Work Act 2009. The court was satisfied that the process was fair and transparent, and there was no evidence of coercion or undue influence. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, finding it to be lawful and binding. The final orders confirmed the approval of the agreement and directed its implementation between the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.