Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald

Case [2013] FWCA 7410


[2013] FWCA 7410

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald
(AG2013/9540)

BAMBI CHILD CARE CENTRE - FITZGERALD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Children’s services

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 26 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 3 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE404341  PR542452>

Details
AGLC
Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald [2013] FWCA 7410
Case
[2013] FWCA 7410
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an application for the approval of the Bambi Child Care Centre - Fitzgerald Enterprise Agreement 2013. The applicant, Bambi Child Care Centre, sought to have the agreement recognised as a lawful and binding contract between the employer and its employees. The dispute arose from the negotiation process and the content of the proposed agreement, which the employees had rejected.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it complied with the relevant statutory requirements. Specifically, the court had to determine if the agreement was made in good faith, if it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and if the process leading to its creation was fair and transparent.

The court found that the agreement was indeed the product of genuine negotiation and met all statutory requirements. The evidence presented indicated that the negotiation process was conducted in good faith, with both parties making efforts to reach a consensus. The agreement contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions stipulated by the Fair Work Act 2009. The court was satisfied that the process was fair and transparent, and there was no evidence of coercion or undue influence. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, finding it to be lawful and binding. The final orders confirmed the approval of the agreement and directed its implementation between the parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.