| [2022] FWCA 3100 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Ballarat Day Procedure Centre Pty Ltd
(AG2022/3480)
Ballarat Day Procedure Enterprise Agreement 2022
| Health and welfare services | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 7 SEPTEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Ballarat Day Procedure Enterprise Agreement 2022
An application has been made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Ballarat Day Procedure Centre Pty Ltd for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Ballarat Day Procedure Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement).
The employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Health Services Union and Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 September 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 7 September 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517336 PR745580>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Ballarat Day Procedure Centre Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 3100
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3100
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the provisions of the proposed agreement against the legislative standards set out in the Fair Work Act. The applicant argued that the agreement was in accordance with the law and appropriately reflected the terms and conditions of employment. However, the Fair Work Ombudsman raised objections, contending that the agreement failed to meet specific obligations regarding minimum wage rates and other entitlements. The Commission carefully assessed the arguments and evidence presented by both parties, focusing on whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for employees and complied with all relevant legal requirements.
After thorough consideration, the Fair Work Commission determined that the proposed agreement did not satisfy all statutory obligations. The Commission found that certain provisions of the agreement fell short of the minimum standards prescribed by the Fair Work Act, particularly in relation to wage rates and other employment conditions. Consequently, the Commission refused to approve the agreement. The applicant was directed to make necessary amendments to ensure compliance with the law before resubmitting the agreement for approval.
The Fair Work Commission's decision resulted in the refusal of the proposed agreement. The applicant was required to revise the agreement to meet all statutory requirements, including those related to minimum wage rates and other employment conditions. The Commission did not make any final orders regarding the terms of the revised agreement, as it was left to the parties to negotiate and submit a compliant agreement for future consideration.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.