| [2016] FWCA 2305 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Ballarat and Queen’s Anglican Grammar School T/A Ballarat Grammar
(AG2016/2592)
BALLARAT AND QUEEN’S ANGLICAN GRAMMAR SCHOOL (TEACHERS) AGREEMENT NOVEMBER 2015 - OCTOBER 2019
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 13 APRIL 2016 |
Application for approval of the Ballarat and Queen’s Anglican Grammar School (Teachers) Agreement November 2015 - October 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Ballarat and Queen’s Anglican Grammar School (Teachers) Agreement November 2015 - October 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Ballarat and Queen’s Anglican Grammar School T/A Ballarat Grammar. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 13 April 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 20 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE418559 PR578992>
- AGLC
- Ballarat and Queen’s Anglican Grammar School T/A Ballarat Grammar [2016] FWCA 2305
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2305
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was in the best interests of the employees, being the teachers. The respondents argued that the proposed agreement did not meet the requirements of the Act and was not in the best interests of the employees, as it did not provide adequate protections for the employees.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement did not meet the requirements of the Act as it did not include a provision for the resolution of disputes between the parties. However, the Commission also found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications, including the addition of a dispute resolution clause. The school and the teachers’ union were directed to make the necessary changes to the agreement and submit it to the Commission for final approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.