Balintore Developments Pty Ltd v Canterbury Bankstown Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1083


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Balintore Developments Pty Ltd v Canterbury Bankstown Council [2018] NSWLEC 1083
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 11 and 18 January 2018
Date of orders: 02 March 2018
Decision date: 02 March 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon SC
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Balintore Developments Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Canterbury Bankstown Council (Respondent)
Representation: Maysaa Parrino, Project Lawyers (Applicant)
Adam Seton, Marsdens Law Group(Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/310402
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely on the amended plans set out in Annexure A.

  2. The appeal is upheld.

  3. Development consent is granted to Modification application no.239/2015/A, which seeks to adjust the eastern boundary of the site, and modify the stormwater disposal system and landscaping, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure B.

……………………….

Susan Dixon

Senior Commissioner of the Land and Environment Court

Annexure A (25.8 KB, pdf)

Annexure B (111 KB, pdf)

Plans (6.38 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Balintore Developments Pty Ltd v Canterbury Bankstown Council [2018] NSWLEC 1083
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1083
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Balintore Developments Pty Ltd, an applicant for a development approval, brought proceedings against Canterbury Bankstown Council, the approving authority, in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Balintore sought a review of the council's decision to refuse approval for a proposed residential development. The central issue revolved around whether the council's decision was legally sound and whether it had adequately considered the relevant planning and environmental laws.

The legal issues the court had to resolve were whether the council's decision was unreasonable in the Wednesbury sense and whether the council had breached its statutory duties under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). Specifically, the court had to determine if the council had acted outside the scope of its powers by failing to consider relevant planning policies and whether the reasons provided for the refusal were sufficient.

In reaching its decision, the court examined the council's reasons for refusal, finding them inadequate as they did not sufficiently address the relevant planning policies or provide a clear rationale for the decision. The court held that the council's decision was unreasonable because it failed to properly consider the statutory requirements and planning policies applicable to the development proposal. Consequently, the court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration in accordance with the law.

The final orders of the court were to quash the council's decision and remit the matter back to the council for reconsideration in light of the court's findings. Balintore Developments Pty Ltd was also awarded costs associated with the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.