Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Balintore Developments Pty Ltd v Canterbury Bankstown Council [2018] NSWLEC 1083 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 11 and 18 January 2018 Date of orders: 02 March 2018 Decision date: 02 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Balintore Developments Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Canterbury Bankstown Council (Respondent)Representation: Maysaa Parrino, Project Lawyers (Applicant)
Adam Seton, Marsdens Law Group(Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/310402 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely on the amended plans set out in Annexure A.
The appeal is upheld.
Development consent is granted to Modification application no.239/2015/A, which seeks to adjust the eastern boundary of the site, and modify the stormwater disposal system and landscaping, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure B.
……………………….
Susan Dixon
Senior Commissioner of the Land and Environment Court
Annexure A (25.8 KB, pdf)
Annexure B (111 KB, pdf)
Plans (6.38 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Balintore Developments Pty Ltd v Canterbury Bankstown Council [2018] NSWLEC 1083
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1083
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to resolve were whether the council's decision was unreasonable in the Wednesbury sense and whether the council had breached its statutory duties under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). Specifically, the court had to determine if the council had acted outside the scope of its powers by failing to consider relevant planning policies and whether the reasons provided for the refusal were sufficient.
In reaching its decision, the court examined the council's reasons for refusal, finding them inadequate as they did not sufficiently address the relevant planning policies or provide a clear rationale for the decision. The court held that the council's decision was unreasonable because it failed to properly consider the statutory requirements and planning policies applicable to the development proposal. Consequently, the court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration in accordance with the law.
The final orders of the court were to quash the council's decision and remit the matter back to the council for reconsideration in light of the court's findings. Balintore Developments Pty Ltd was also awarded costs associated with the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.