Baladi v Botany Bay City Council

Case

[2007] NSWLEC 18

15 January 2007

No judgment structure available for this case.


Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Baladi v Botany Bay City Council [2007] NSWLEC 18
PARTIES:

Applicant:
George Baladi

Respondent:
Botany Bay City Council
FILE NUMBER(S): 10203 of 2006
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- consent orders
DATES OF HEARING: 15/01/2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 15 January 2007
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Applicant:
Ms S Levy, solicitor of KQ Lawyers

Respondent:
Mr T O'Connor, solicitor of Houston Dearn O'Connor



JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      Roseth SC

      15 January 2007

      10203 of 2006 George Baladi v Botany Bay City Council

      JUDGMENT

1 Senior Commissioner: This is an appeal against the refusal by Botany Bay City Council (the council) of a development application to demolish the existing buildings and construct a new factory on lot B DP 414617 and lot 3 DP 29697, known as 4 Chalmers Crescent, Mascot.

2 The applicant lodged the original application in September 2004. The council refused it in September 2005. The applicant prepared several amendments and requested the council, on two occasions, to re-consider the matter under s82A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. On the second occasion, in November 2006, the council resolved to seek consent orders from the Court. There are no objectors to the latest set of plans. Following perusal of the plans and conditions, the Court agrees to the request for consent orders.

      Orders

1. The appeal is allowed by consent.

2. Development application to demolish the existing buildings and construct a new factory on lot B DP 414617 and lot 3 DP 29697, known as 4 Chalmers Crescent, Mascot is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.

3. Exhibits 1 and A are retained on the Court’s files.


      _________________
      Dr John Roseth
      Senior Commissioner
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0