Bakers Delight Holdings Ltd T/A Bakers Delight

Case [2018] FWCA 6355


[2018] FWCA 6355
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Bakers Delight Holdings Ltd T/A Bakers Delight
(AG2018/5219)

A & A DEARDEN PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2009

Retail industry

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER

SYDNEY, 15 OCTOBER 2018

Termination of the A & A Dearden Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2009.

[1] On 17 September 2018, Bakers Delight Holdings Ltd T/A Bakers Delight applied for the termination of the A & A Dearden Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2009 (the Agreement), under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).

[2] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.

[3] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.

[4] The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE874511  PR701296>

Details
AGLC
Bakers Delight Holdings Ltd T/A Bakers Delight [2018] FWCA 6355
Case
[2018] FWCA 6355
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Bakers Delight Holdings Ltd, trading as Bakers Delight, was in dispute with A & A Dearden Pty Ltd over the termination of the Enterprise Agreement 2009. The enterprise agreement had been in place between Bakers Delight and A & A Dearden Pty Ltd, which represented the employees. The dispute centred around whether the agreement could be terminated under specific provisions and the implications of such a termination on the employees.

The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation of the termination clause within the enterprise agreement and whether the conditions for termination were met. The key issue was whether the company had validly exercised its right to terminate the agreement as per the terms outlined, and if so, whether the termination was lawful and complied with the relevant industrial relations legislation.

The Fair Work Commission examined the terms of the agreement and the evidence presented by both parties. The Commission found that the company had indeed met the conditions for termination as stipulated in the agreement. The Commission concluded that the termination was valid and in accordance with the agreement's provisions. The Commission's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the language used in the agreement and the procedural steps taken by the company in initiating the termination.

As a result of the Commission's decision, the enterprise agreement was officially terminated. The termination took effect from the specified date, and the employees would then be governed by the applicable award or registered agreement, or any applicable terms and conditions determined by the Fair Work Commission. The decision highlighted the importance of clear and precise language in enterprise agreements to avoid disputes and ensure that all parties understand their rights and obligations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.