Baker Hughes Australia Pty Limited T/A Baker Hughes Australia Pty Ltd

Case

[2025] FWCA 588

14 FEBRUARY 2025


[2025] FWCA 588

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Baker Hughes Australia Pty Limited T/A Baker Hughes Australia Pty Ltd

(AG2025/190)

BAKER HUGHES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD E-LINE AND SLICKLINE OFFSHORE ESSO BASS STRAIT AGREEMENT 2023

Oil and gas industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE

MELBOURNE, 14 FEBRUARY 2025

Application for approval of the Baker Hughes Australia Pty Ltd E-Line and Slickline Offshore Esso Bass Strait Agreement 2023

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Baker Hughes Australia Pty Ltd E-Line and Slickline Offshore Esso Bass Strait Agreement 2023 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). It has been made by Baker Hughes Australia Limited T/A Baker Hughes Australia Pty Ltd (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that each requirement of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. For the purposes of the better off overall test, I have had regard to each of the matters in s 193A(2)-(7).

  1. Pursuant to s 205A(2) of the Act, the workplace delegates’ rights term prescribed by the Hydrocarbons Industry (Upstream) Award 2020 is taken to be a term of the Agreement. 

  1. The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement supports the approval of the Agreement and has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation. 

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act will operate from 21 February 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2028.

Variation

  1. Concurrently with the approval application, the Employer also filed an amending application seeking a variation of the Agreement under s 218A of the Act. The s 218A amending application is said to have been made on the basis that the Agreement contained typographical errors when referencing ‘Schedule A’ rather than ‘Schedules A and B’ and when referencing the applicant’s name as ‘Baker Hughes Australia Pty Ltd Pty Limited’ rather than ‘Baker Hughes Australia Pty Limited’ in clause 3.1.

  1. The employee bargaining representatives were provided with an opportunity to address the s 218A application. No submissions were made.

  1. Section 218A of the Act was inserted by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs Better Pay) Act 2022 to provide a process for varying an enterprise agreement to “correct or amend an obvious error, defect or irregularity,” whether in substance or form. It provides as follows:

Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors, defects or irregularities

(1) The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to correct or amend an obvious error, defect or irregularity (whether in substance or form).

(2) The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement under subsection (1):

(a) on its own initiative; or
(b) on application by any of the following:

(i) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(ii) an employee covered by the agreement;
(iii) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

(3) If the FWC varies an enterprise agreement under subsection (1), the variation operates from the day specified in the decision to vary the agreement

  1. Before an enterprise agreement may be varied under s 218A of the Act, there must be satisfaction of the existence of an obvious error, defect or irregularity (whether in substance or form)

  1. I am satisfied that the error in referencing ‘Schedule A’ rather than ‘Schedules A and B’ and in referring the applicant’s name in clause 3.1 of the Agreement are each obvious errors. I accept that these errors were made typographically in the drafting of the Agreement.

  1. The exercise of the Commission’s discretion is directed to “correct or amend” the obvious error identified. I consider the errors identified are of a kind that may be corrected by varying the Agreement to amend the reference of “Schedule A” to “Schedules A and B” as well as to amend clause 3.1 to refer to “Baker Hughes Australia Pty Limited’ rather than ‘Baker Hughes Australia Pty Ltd Pty Limited.”

  1. I consider that the corrections proposed by this application are necessary and appropriate to ensure that the Agreement accurately reflects what was clearly intended, and will provide certainty when referring to provisions of the Agreement. There are no grounds telling against the exercise of my discretion to vary the Agreement to correct the errors

  1. Accordingly, the errors will be corrected in the manner sought and as specified in the order that follows. The order will operate from the date of this decision.

Order

  1. Pursuant to s 218A of the Act, I order that the Agreement be varied to correct obvious errors as follows:

(1)   By deleting “Schedule A” where it appears in the definition of “Minimum Base Salary,” “Job Title,” “Offshore Allowance,” and “Workshop Rates” in the Definition section on page 2 of the Agreement and replacing it with ‘Schedules A and B.”

(2)   By deleting “Schedule A” and replacing it with “Schedules A and B” in clauses 4.3, 5.2, 6.2 and 8.10 of the Agreement.

(3)   By deleting in clause 3.1 “Baker Hughes Australia Pty Ltd Pty Limited” and replacing it with “Baker Hughes Australia Pty Limited.”

  1. The published Agreement will contain the corrections described in the above order.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE528040  PR784359>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0