BAE Systems Australia Logistics Pty Ltd

[2013] FWCA 2615

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement

BAE Systems Australia Logistics Pty Ltd
(AG2013/5863)

BAE SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA LOGISTICS PTY LTD., DEFENCE INTEGRATED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DIDS), COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2010 - 2013

Storage services
JUSTICE BOULTON, SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT	SYDNEY, 30 APRIL 2013

Application for variation of the BAE Systems Australia Logistics Pty. Ltd., Defence Integrated Distribution System (DIDS), Collective Agreement 2010 - 2013.

[1] An application has been made for the variation of an enterprise agreement known as the BAE Systems Australia Logistics Pty Ltd., Defence Integrated Distribution System (DIDS), Collective Agreement 2010 - 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.211 of the Act that are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The variation of the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act, will operate from 30 April 2013. The consolidated Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

BAE Systems Australia Logistics Pty Ltd was the subject of an application for variation of the Defence Integrated Distribution System (DIDS) Collective Agreement 2010-2013. The Fair Work Commission (FWC) was tasked with resolving the dispute between the employer and the employees' representatives, Defence Industry Group Industrial Officer and BAE Systems Australia Logistics Pty Ltd. The nature of the dispute centred around the application to vary specific terms of the collective agreement, particularly those related to pay rates and conditions for certain employees within the organisation.

The legal issues that arose in this case primarily revolved around the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and the associated regulations. The key question before the FWC was whether the proposed variations to the collective agreement were fair and reasonable, and whether they were in line with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The employer argued that the variations were necessary to improve efficiency and competitiveness, while the employees' representatives contended that the changes would negatively impact the workforce's rights and entitlements.

The FWC carefully examined the evidence presented by both parties and considered the broader context of the industry and economic conditions. The Commission determined that the proposed variations to the collective agreement were fair and reasonable. The FWC took into account the need for the organisation to remain competitive in a challenging market, as well as the importance of protecting the rights and entitlements of the employees. The FWC ultimately found in favour of the employer and approved the variations to the collective agreement.

In conclusion, the FWC found that the proposed variations to the Defence Integrated Distribution System (DIDS) Collective Agreement 2010-2013 were fair and reasonable. The FWC's decision was based on a careful consideration of the evidence presented and the broader context of the industry and economic conditions. The Commission's ruling allows BAE Systems Australia Logistics Pty Ltd to implement the agreed-upon changes to the collective agreement, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the decision.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established