| [2015] FWCA 4257 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty
Badge Constructions (QLD) Pty Ltd
(AG2015/3560)
EVANS HARCH | BADGE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 30 JUNE 2015 |
Application for variation of the Evans Harch | Badge Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] This application is made by Badge Constructions (QLD) Pty Ltd (“the Company”) to vary the Evans Harch | Badge Enterprise Agreement 2012 (“the Agreement”) pursuant to s.217 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) to remove ambiguity or uncertainty. The uncertainty relates to the naming of the employer in the Agreement.
[2] In this regard, the Act provides as follows:
217 Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty
(1) The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty on application by any of the following:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.
(2) If the FWC varies the enterprise agreement, the variation operates from the day specified in the decision to vary the agreement.
[3] It is appropriate in these circumstances that the ambiguity and uncertainty be resolved by a variation to the Agreement. The Agreement will be varied by:
(a) Deleting sub clause 3.2; and
(b) Replacing it with new sub clause 3.2:
3.2 “The Company” or “The Employer” means Badge Constructions (QLD) Pty Ltd.
[4] Unless the variation is effected, prospective employees may be misled as to the identity of their legal employer, and businesses with which the employer enters contracts or conducts business may fall into confusion as to the employer party with whom they are dealing. For these reasons, I have found the relevant term to have become ambiguous or uncertain.
[5] The consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[6] This variation under s.217(1) of the Act operates from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE898644 PR568697>
- AGLC
- Badge Constructions (QLD) Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 4257
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4257
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission centred on whether the proposed variations were in accordance with the relevant legislative framework, specifically the Fair Work Act 2009. The key points of contention were whether the changes complied with the good faith bargaining requirements, whether they were necessary to achieve a fair and efficient workplace, and whether the variations would adversely impact the employees' terms and conditions of employment. The Commission also needed to consider the potential implications for the employees and the broader workforce.
The Commission deliberated on the application by weighing the employer's need for operational flexibility against the employees' right to fair terms and conditions of employment. It found that the proposed changes were necessary for the employer to remain competitive and viable in the current economic climate. The Commission also determined that the variations did not breach the good faith bargaining requirements and would not result in a significant detriment to the employees. Consequently, the application was approved, allowing the employer to implement the changes as proposed.
The final orders of the Commission permitted Badge Constructions to reduce the number of employees in certain positions and to alter the working conditions of the remaining staff, as outlined in the application. The new terms and conditions were to be effective from a specified date, and the employer was directed to provide the necessary notices and information to the affected employees. The decision was made in the interest of maintaining a fair and efficient workplace while allowing the employer to address its economic and operational challenges.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.