FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| BABETT & FALCONER | [2015] FCCA 1813 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Stay – application for stay of property orders pending appeal – where appeal determined – where application now spent – where orders appealed against have been set aside – application of no force or effect. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| Cases cited: Babett & Falconer [2015] FAMCAFC 124 |
| Applicant: | MR BABETT |
| Respondent: | MS FALCONER |
| File Number: | SYC 6278 of 2011 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Scarlett |
| Hearing date: | 3 March 2014 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 3 March 2014 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 30 June 2015 |
REPRESENTATION
| Solicitor for the Applicant: | Mr Todd |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Watts McCray Lawyers |
| Respondent: | In person |
ORDERS
The Application in a Case filed on 3 March 2014 is dismissed.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Babett & Falconer is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYC 6278 of 2011
| MR BABETT |
Applicant
And
| MS FALCONER |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Application in a Case
The Applicant filed an Application in a Case on 3 March 2014 seeking a stay of Orders of this Court made on 13 November 2013 pending his appeal to the Full Court of the Family Court filed on 10 December 2013.
The Application for a stay has not been decided.
The Appeal
The Appeal was heard on 3 February 2015 and a decision was handed down by the Full Court on 26 June 2015 (Babett & Falconer[1]). The Appeal was allowed and the Orders of this Court were set aside. The Full Court ordered that the wife’s applications for settlement of property and child support departure were to be remitted to the Federal Court to be heard by another Judge.
The Application for a Stay
The Application in a Case filed on 3 March 2014 sought only the one Order, namely:
1. That Orders 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 of the Orders of the Federal Circuit Court dated 13 November 2013 be stayed pending determination of the Appeal to the Full Court of the Family Court filed by the Applicant Husband on 10 December 2013.
The Appeal to the Full Court of the Family Court has been heard and determined. The Orders of this Court appealed against have been set aside.
Consequently, this Application is of no force or effect. The Application will therefore be dismissed.
I certify that the preceding six (6) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Scarlett
Associate:
Date: 30 June 2015
- AGLC
- BABETT & FALCONER [2015] FCCA 1813
- Case
- [2015] FCCA 1813
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant's application, filed on 3 March 2014, should be permitted to proceed.
Judge Scarlett dismissed the application. No specific reasoning or legal principles were provided in the extract to explain the basis for this decision.
The court ordered that the Application in a Case filed on 3 March 2014 be dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The Application in a Case filed on 3 March 2014 is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.