B and M

Case [2003] FMCAfam 113


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

B & M [2003] FMCAfam 113

CHILD SUPPORT – Application seeking declaration pursuant to s.107 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act and that child support payments be stayed – recover child support payments – basis of application is that Applicant is not the biological father of children – parentage testing determined that applicant is not biological father.

Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989, ss.107, 114, 117, 117(1), 117(2), 117(3), 117(5), 143, 143(3)

Tobin v Tobin (1999) FLC 92-848
Houlihan  & Houlihan (1991) FLC 92-248

Applicant: D B
Respondent: M M
File No: MLM 5255 of 2002
Delivered on: 8 May 2003
Delivered at: Melbourne
Hearing Dates: 19 & 29 November 2002
Judgment of: Bryant CFM

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Betts
Solicitors for the Applicant: Roberts Nehmer McKee, Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms Weiner
Solicitors for the Respondent: Cohen Woolf & Weinberg, Solicitors

ORDERS

IT IS DECLARED:

  1. That pursuant to s.107 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 the respondent is not entitled to administrative assessment of Child Support from the applicant for the children R B and L B.

IT IS ORDERED:

  1. That there be a departure from administrative assessment child support for the child A B:

    (a)for the period 25 January 1999 to 1 December 2002 and Child Support payable by the liable parent D B for the said period be fixed at the amount paid by him to the Child Support Agency during that period and during the said period the liable parent D B not be entitled to any credit for any other payments made to the carer; and

    (b)for the period 1 December 2002 until 31 December 2004 the liable parent’s child support income be reduced by $4015 per annum and otherwise calculated in accordance with the administrative provisions of the Child Support (Assessment) Act1989.

  2. The Child Support Registrar be requested to amend the Child Support Register to give effect to these orders.

  3. That all outstanding Applications be dismissed.

  4. That all exhibits be returned to the parties by whom they were tendered.

  5. That all subpoenaed documents be returned to the persons from whom they were subpoenaed at the expiration of 30 days from the date of these orders.

IT IS NOTED:

  1. That the intention of these orders is that the liable parent will have no liability for any arrears of child support for the child A B prior to the
    1 December 2002.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
MELBOURNE

MLM5255 of 2002

D B

Applicant

And

M M

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. The application brought by the father pursuant to the provisions of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) (“the Act”) seeks a declaration pursuant to s.107 of the Act that the respondent wife was not entitled to an administrative assessment of child support for two of their three children, R and L. The basis of the declaration sought is that the applicant is not the biological father of the children. Previous orders…

Continue reading B and M

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
B and M [2003] FMCAfam 113
Case
[2003] FMCAfam 113
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Family Court of Australia, the matter of B and M was heard concerning the assessment and payment of child support for three children: R B, L B, and A B. The dispute arose between the applicant, B, and the respondent, M, with the matter being addressed by Justice Bromberg. The primary legal issues involved the entitlement of M to administrative child support assessments from B, and the appropriate calculation of child support for the child A B for specific periods.

The court had to determine whether M was eligible for an administrative assessment of child support under section 107 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989. Additionally, the court needed to decide the correct method of calculating child support for A B for the periods 25 January 1999 to 1 December 2002 and 1 December 2002 to 31 December 2004. Justice Bromberg evaluated the statutory provisions, the evidence presented, and the relevant case law to reach a decision.

Justice Bromberg concluded that M was not entitled to an administrative assessment of child support from B for the children R B and L B. For the child A B, the court ordered a departure from administrative assessment for the period 25 January 1999 to 1 December 2002, setting the child support amount paid by the liable parent, D B, to the Child Support Agency during that period, with no credit for other payments made to the carer. For the period 1 December 2002 until 31 December 2004, the liable parent’s child support income was reduced by $4015 per annum, with the remainder calculated according to the administrative provisions of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989. The court also issued orders for the amendment of the Child Support Register and the return of exhibits and subpoenaed documents.

Orders

Orders of the court

IT IS DECLARED:

1.

That pursuant to s.107 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 the respondent is not entitled to administrative assessment of Child Support from the applicant for the children R B and L B.

IT IS ORDERED:

2.

That there be a departure from administrative assessment child support for the child A B:

(a) for the period 25 January 1999 to 1 December 2002 and Child Support payable by the liable parent D B for the said period be fixed at the amount paid by him to the Child Support Agency during that period and during the said period the liable parent D B not be entitled to any credit for any other payments made to the carer; and

(b) for the period 1 December 2002 until 31 December 2004 the liable parent’s child support income be reduced by $4015 per annum and otherwise calculated in accordance with the administrative provisions of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989.

3.

The Child Support Registrar be requested to amend the Child Support Register to give effect to these orders.

4.

That all outstanding Applications be dismissed.

5.

That all exhibits be returned to the parties by whom they were tendered.

6.

That all subpoenaed documents be returned to the persons from whom they were subpoenaed at the expiration of 30 days from the date of these orders.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.