FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Citation: Azzi v Omar [2012] FCA 625 Parties: SAMIRA AZZI and SIMON AZZI v AZZELDEEN OMAR and MAHMOUD OMAR File number: NSD 714 of 2012 Judge: EMMETT J Date of judgment: 29 May 2012 Date of hearing: 29 May 2012 Place: Sydney Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: No catchwords Number of paragraphs: 19 Counsel for the applicants: IS Wylie Solicitor for the applicants: Thomsons Lawyers Counsel for the respondents: RA Parsons Solicitor for the respondents: Sterling Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 714 of 2012
BETWEEN: SAMIRA AZZI
First ApplicantSIMON AZZI
Second ApplicantAND: AZZELDEEN OMAR
First RespondentMAHMOUD OMAR
Second Respondent
JUDGE:
EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
29 MAY 2012
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT NOTES THAT:
1.The first respondent undertakes to the Court to:
1.1no later than 10am on 31 May 2012, cover or remove all external signs at 43-49 South Street, Granville which contain the Awafi name or the Awafi Rooster Device, and after that time not to display the Awafi name or device on the exterior of 43-49 South Street, Granville.
1.2maintain the interior signage and get-up of the business at 43-49 South Street, Granville as is at the present date;
1.3not display the Awafi name or the Awafi Rooster Device in any media advertising, handbills or like promotion; and
1.4not use the Awafi name or the Awafi Rooster Device in connection with any business other than at 43-49 South Street Granville without first giving sixty (60) days’ notice to the applicants’ solicitors of his intention to do so;
2.The applicants undertake to the Court to:
2.1no later than 10am on 31 May 2012, cover or remove all external signs at 107 South Street, Granville which contain the Awafi name or the Awafi Rooster Device, and after that time not to display the Awafi name or device on the exterior of 107 South Street, Granville; and
2.2not display the Awafi name or the Awafi Rooster Device in any media advertising, handbills or like promotion.
3.The first applicant and first respondent each gives the usual undertaking as to damages.
4.The first applicant and first respondent each gives an undertaking to keep proper accounts and records of the trading at 43-49 South Street, Granville, in the case of the first respondent and 107 South Street, Granville, in the case of the first applicant.
5.The above undertakings are to continue until final hearing and determination of the proceedings, or until they are discharged by order of the Court.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
6.The proceeding be listed for further directions at 9.30am on Friday, 1 June 2012 before the docket judge (Rares J).
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 714 of 2012
BETWEEN: SAMIRA AZZI
First ApplicantSIMON AZZI
Second ApplicantAND: AZZELDEEN OMAR
First RespondentMAHMOUD…
Continue reading Azzi v Omar
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Azzi v Omar [2012] FCA 625
- Case
- [2012] FCA 625
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the contract between the parties was valid and enforceable, and if the court should make a declaration that the contract was valid and binding. The court had to consider the terms of the contract, the intention of the parties, and whether there was any vitiating factor that could render the contract void or voidable.
The court held that the contract was valid and binding on the parties. It found that the contract had been entered into with the intention of the parties to be legally bound, and there were no vitiating factors present. The court also noted that the contract was in writing and signed by both parties, which strengthened its enforceability. The court granted the plaintiff's request for a declaration that the contract was valid and binding. The court also ordered that the matter be listed for further directions to determine the next steps in the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
6. The proceeding be listed for further directions at 9.30am on Friday, 1 June 2012 before the docket judge (Rares J).
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.