AWWAD (Migration)
[2019] AATA 4819
•17 October 2019
AWWAD (Migration) [2019] AATA 4819 (17 October 2019)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: ALMOUTASEM BELLAH TARIQ MOUSA AWWAD
CASE NUMBER: 1803218
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2017/3342487
MEMBER:P. Wood
DATE:17 October 2019
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Statement made on 17 October 2019 at 2:40pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION –Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – subclass 500 (Student) visa– evidence of English language ability provided – decision under review remittedLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 500.213STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 13 September 2017. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 31 January 2018.
The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of English language ability was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
The applicant has since provided the Tribunal with evidence of completion of a satisfactory IELTS test with an overall score of six (6). In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
P. Wood
Senior Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
0
0
0