NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: AWL [2016] NSWCATGD 16 Hearing dates: 22 March 2016 Date of orders: 22 March 2016 Decision date: 22 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: J Currie, Senior Member (Legal)
M Wroth, Senior Member (Professional)
S Rylands, General MemberDecision: Guardianship order made; private guardian appointed for 12 months with health care and services functions.
Financial management order dismissed.
Legal Representation application dismissed.Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP – application for guardianship order – subject person’s views considered – consideration of factors in s 14(2) of the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) – subject person’s welfare and interests – preserving family relationships – application of s 15(3) of the Guardianship Act
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – approach to assessing whether has capacity to manage their affairs – whether need for a financial management order – no need – financial management application dismissed
INTERLOCUTORY – application for leave to be legally represented – consideration of factors in s 36(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal 2013 (NSW) –whether Tribunal would be assisted – McKenzie Friend – leave refusedLegislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 36(1)
Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss 4, 4(a), 14(2), 15(3), 17Cases Cited: CJ v AKJ [2015] NSWSC 498
P v R [2003] NSWSC 819
PB v BB [2013] NSWSC 1223
Re D [2012] NSWSC 1006
Re W and L (Parameters of Protected Estate Management Orders) [2014] NSW SC 1106Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr AWL (the subject person)
Mr KRD (the applicant)
The NSW Public Guardian
The NSW Trustee and GuardianRepresentation: Nil
File Number(s): 61803 Publication restriction: Decisions of the Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal have been anonymised to remove any information that may identify any person involved in the Tribunal’s proceedings (s 65, Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)).
REASONS FOR DECISION
What the Tribunal decided
Guardianship
-
The Tribunal decided to make a continuing limited guardianship order for Mr AWL. Ms UVK was appointed as Mr AWL’s guardian for 12 months and authorised to make decisions on his behalf about his health care and services.
Financial management
-
The Tribunal decided to dismiss the financial management application on the ground that it was not satisfied that Mr AWL was incapable of managing his affairs.
Legal Representation
-
The Tribunal decided to dismiss the application for Mr AWL to be represented by an Australian legal practitioner in all proceedings pending before the Tribunal.
Background
-
Mr AWL is a 64-year-old man who is reported to have long-standing problems concerning his alcohol consumption and anxiety. It is reported that Mr AWL has had regular hospital admissions when he is feeling anxious and that he has on many occasions admitted himself to hospital, only to discharge himself after a short stay. It is reported that Mr AWL has limited insight into his own ability to abstain from alcohol and as to the effect which alcohol has on his health and ability to make informed decisions. Mr AWL is…
Continue reading AWL
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- AWL [2016] NSWCATGD 16
- Case
- [2016] NSWCATGD 16
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether AWL had the capacity to manage their affairs and whether a guardianship order was necessary to protect their welfare and interests. The court had to balance AWL's autonomy against their need for protection, particularly in relation to preserving family relationships as per section 15(3) of the Guardianship Act. The financial management aspect required the court to assess if there was a necessity for an order to manage AWL’s finances. The application for legal representation by a McKenzie Friend was evaluated based on whether it would aid the Tribunal in making a fair decision.
The court found that AWL required a guardianship order to safeguard their welfare and interests, and it appointed a private guardian for a period of 12 months with specific functions related to health care and services. The court determined that AWL did not need a financial management order, as they had the capacity to manage their financial affairs. The application for legal representation by a McKenzie Friend was dismissed as it was not deemed to assist the Tribunal in this matter.
In conclusion, the court granted a guardianship order appointing a private guardian for AWL for 12 months with specific health care and services functions. The court dismissed the application for a financial management order and the application for leave to be legally represented by a McKenzie Friend.
Orders
Orders of the court
Guardianship order made; private guardian appointed for 12 months with health care and services functions.
Financial management order dismissed.
Legal Representation application dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.