AWL

Case [2016] NSWCATGD 16


NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: AWL [2016] NSWCATGD 16
Hearing dates:22 March 2016
Date of orders: 22 March 2016
Decision date: 22 March 2016
Jurisdiction:Guardianship Division
Before: J Currie, Senior Member (Legal)
M Wroth, Senior Member (Professional)
S Rylands, General Member
Decision:

Guardianship order made; private guardian appointed for 12 months with health care and services functions.

 

Financial management order dismissed.

 Legal Representation application dismissed.
Catchwords:

GUARDIANSHIP – application for guardianship order – subject person’s views considered – consideration of factors in s 14(2) of the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) – subject person’s welfare and interests – preserving family relationships – application of s 15(3) of the Guardianship Act

 

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – approach to assessing whether has capacity to manage their affairs – whether need for a financial management order – no need – financial management application dismissed

INTERLOCUTORY – application for leave to be legally represented – consideration of factors in s 36(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal 2013 (NSW) –whether Tribunal would be assisted – McKenzie Friend – leave refused
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 36(1)
Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss 4, 4(a), 14(2), 15(3), 17
Cases Cited: CJ v AKJ [2015] NSWSC 498
P v R [2003] NSWSC 819
PB v BB [2013] NSWSC 1223
Re D [2012] NSWSC 1006
Re W and L (Parameters of Protected Estate Management Orders) [2014] NSW SC 1106
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Mr AWL (the subject person)
Mr KRD (the applicant)
The NSW Public Guardian
The NSW Trustee and Guardian
Representation: Nil
File Number(s):61803
Publication restriction:Decisions of the Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal have been anonymised to remove any information that may identify any person involved in the Tribunal’s proceedings (s 65, Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)).

REASONS FOR DECISION

What the Tribunal decided

Guardianship

  1. The Tribunal decided to make a continuing limited guardianship order for Mr AWL. Ms UVK was appointed as Mr AWL’s guardian for 12 months and authorised to make decisions on his behalf about his health care and services.

Financial management

  1. The Tribunal decided to dismiss the financial management application on the ground that it was not satisfied that Mr AWL was incapable of managing his affairs.

Legal Representation

  1. The Tribunal decided to dismiss the application for Mr AWL to be represented by an Australian legal practitioner in all proceedings pending before the Tribunal.

Background

  1. Mr AWL is a 64-year-old man who is reported to have long-standing problems concerning his alcohol consumption and anxiety. It is reported that Mr AWL has had regular hospital admissions when he is feeling anxious and that he has on many occasions admitted himself to hospital, only to discharge himself after a short stay. It is reported that Mr AWL has limited insight into his own ability to abstain from alcohol and as to the effect which alcohol has on his health and ability to make informed decisions. Mr AWL is…

Continue reading AWL

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
AWL [2016] NSWCATGD 16
Case
[2016] NSWCATGD 16
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter involved an application for a guardianship order and a financial management order concerning an individual identified as AWL, under the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW). AWL's views were considered as part of the process, alongside other factors stipulated in section 14(2) of the Act. The primary dispute revolved around whether AWL required a guardian to make decisions on their behalf and, if so, the scope of such decisions, including financial management. Additionally, an application for leave to be legally represented by a McKenzie Friend was dismissed under section 36(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal 2013 (NSW), considering whether it would assist the Tribunal.

The court was tasked with determining whether AWL had the capacity to manage their affairs and whether a guardianship order was necessary to protect their welfare and interests. The court had to balance AWL's autonomy against their need for protection, particularly in relation to preserving family relationships as per section 15(3) of the Guardianship Act. The financial management aspect required the court to assess if there was a necessity for an order to manage AWL’s finances. The application for legal representation by a McKenzie Friend was evaluated based on whether it would aid the Tribunal in making a fair decision.

The court found that AWL required a guardianship order to safeguard their welfare and interests, and it appointed a private guardian for a period of 12 months with specific functions related to health care and services. The court determined that AWL did not need a financial management order, as they had the capacity to manage their financial affairs. The application for legal representation by a McKenzie Friend was dismissed as it was not deemed to assist the Tribunal in this matter.

In conclusion, the court granted a guardianship order appointing a private guardian for AWL for 12 months with specific health care and services functions. The court dismissed the application for a financial management order and the application for leave to be legally represented by a McKenzie Friend.

Orders

Orders of the court

Guardianship order made; private guardian appointed for 12 months with health care and services functions.

Financial management order dismissed.

Legal Representation application dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.