Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Avenue 75 Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2024] NSWLEC 1173 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 16 October 2023; 15 November 2023; 13 December 2023; 17 January 2024; 6, 13 and 23 February 2024; 8, 22 and 28 March 2024; 8 April 2024 Date of orders: 11 April 2024 Decision date: 11 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs thrown away by the amendment of the development application in accordance with the documents set out in Annexure A, pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or assessed.
(2) The applicant's written request prepared by Planning Ingenuity dated 13 February 2024, made pursuant to cl 4.6 of the North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013 to vary the maximum building height development standard in cl 4.3 of the North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013, is upheld.
(3) The appeal is upheld.
(4) Development application no. DA88/23, as amended, for the demolition of the existing residential flat building, lot consolidation and construction of a new residential flat building, and alterations and additions to an existing residential flat building at 75-77 Kirribilli Avenue, Kirribilli, is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions at Annexure B.
Catchwords: APPEAL – development application – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 8.15(3)
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, ss 7, 23, 27, 29, 35B, 38; Pts 3, 4; Sch 3; Sch 6, s 27
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34
North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013, cll 2.1, 2.3, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 5.10, 5.21, 6.10, 6.12
State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, Chs 2, 6; Pts 6.2, 6.3
State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021, ss 144, 147; Ch 4; Sch 7A, s 8
State Environmental Planning Policy (Precincts—Eastern Harbour City) 2021, Appendix 1, Pt 1
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, Ch 2, ss 2.10, 2.11; Ch 4, s 4.6
State Environmental Planning Policy (Sustainable Buildings) 2022, ss 4.1, 4.2
State Environmental Planning Policy Amendment (Housing) 2023
Texts Cited: Apartment Design Guide
North Sydney Development Control Plan 2013
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Avenue 75 Pty Ltd (Applicant)
North Sydney Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
A Galasso SC (Applicant)
K Gerathy (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/167010 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
-
These proceedings arise following North Sydney Council’s refusal of a development application (DA88/23) (DA) which seeks consent for lot consolidation, the partial demolition of existing structures, alterations and additions to an existing residential flat building at 77 Kirribilli Avenue and construction of a new residential flat building at 75 Kirribilli Avenue, with basement parking and landscaping works.
-
The site is legally described as SP 10459 and SP 13646,…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Avenue 75 Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] NSWLEC 1173
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the respondent's refusal of the development application was unreasonable and whether the requested variation to the North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013 was warranted. The court also needed to decide whether the appeal against the refusal of consent was well-founded.
In its decision, the court found that the refusal of consent by the respondent was unreasonable. The court held that the refusal was not supported by sufficient evidence and that the applicant had demonstrated a reasonable need for the proposed development. The court further found that the requested variation to the North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013 was justified, as it would enable the applicant to proceed with the proposed development in a manner that was consistent with the overall objectives of the plan. The court also determined that the appeal was well-founded and that the development application should be granted subject to certain conditions.
Accordingly, the court ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs associated with the amendment of the development application. The court also upheld the applicant's request to vary the maximum building height development standard in the North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013 and allowed the appeal against the refusal of consent. The court granted consent for the proposed development, subject to the conditions set out in Annexure B.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs thrown away by the amendment of the development application in accordance with the documents set out in Annexure A, pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or assessed.
(2) The applicant's written request prepared by Planning Ingenuity dated 13 February 2024, made pursuant to cl 4.6 of the North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013 to vary the maximum building height development standard in cl 4.3 of the North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013, is upheld.
(3) The appeal is upheld.
(4) Development application no. DA88/23, as amended, for the demolition of the existing residential flat building, lot consolidation and construction of a new residential flat building, and alterations and additions to an existing residential flat building at 75-77 Kirribilli Avenue, Kirribilli, is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions at Annexure B.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.