| [2022] FWC 131 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.512—Right of entry
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)-Victorian Branch
(RE2021/1252)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 28 JANUARY 2022 |
Application for a right of entry permit for Bobby Ristevski – permit previously issued - permit never received – order revoking missing permit – permit reissued.
The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) applied under s.512 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for the issue of a right of entry permit to its official, Mr Bobby Ristevski. The Commission subsequently issued Mr Ristevski a right of entry permit which will expire on 15 December 2024.
Mr Ristevski’s permit is one of the 37 missing entry permits referred to in decision [2022] FWC 123. As indicated in that decision, in order for Mr Ristevski to hold a valid entry permit, the missing permit must be revoked and a permit must be reissued. In order to issue a permit to Mr Ristevski, I need to be satisfied that he is a fit and proper person to hold a permit under the Act taking into account the permit qualification matters. The relevant statutory considerations set out in [2022] FWC 123 are adopted here and need not be repeated.
Consideration
In support of its application the AMWU filed declarations by Mr Ristevski and Mr Tony Mavromatis, Victorian State Secretary (the Declarations).
Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f)
According to the Declarations:
· Mr Ristevski has received appropriate training about the rights and responsibilities of a permit holder by undertaking a course of training on the subject of a federal right of entry conducted on 9 November 2021 (s.513(1)(a) of the Act));[1]
· Mr Ristevski has never been convicted of an offence against an industrial law (s.513(1)(b) of the Act);[2]
· Mr Ristevski has never been convicted of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, State, Territory or a foreign country, involving conduct described in s.513(1)(c) of the Act;[3]
· Neither Mr Ristevski nor any other person has been ordered to pay a penalty under this Act or any other industrial law in relation to action taken by him (s.513(1)(d) of the Act);[4]
· Mr Ristevski has not had any entry permit issued under Part 3-4 of the Act or a similar law of the Commonwealth revoked, suspended or had imposed conditions on any such permit (s.513(1)(e) of the Act);[5]
· Mr Ristevski has not had cancelled, suspended or imposed conditions on any right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes that Mr Ristevski held under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(i) of the Act);[6] and
· Mr Ristevski has not been disqualified from exercising or applying for a right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(ii) of the Act).[7]
I accept that the information disclosed in the Declarations concerning these matters is accurate and correct. These matters weigh in favour of a conclusion that Mr Ristevski is a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit.
Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(g)
There are no other matters of which I am aware that I consider relevant to the determination of whether Mr Ristevski is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.
Conclusion
Pursuant to s.603 of the Act, the entry permit formerly issued to Mr Ristevski by decision of the delegate is revoked with effect from the date of this decision. A revocation order is separately issued in PR737825.
Taking in account the permit qualification matters, for the reasons earlier stated I am satisfied that Mr Ristevski is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.
A permit will be reissued to Mr Ristevski separately.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Form F42, Declaration by proposed permit holder dated 12 November 2021 at (a) and ACTU Certificate of Completion dated 9 November 2021
[2] Ibid at (b)
[3] Ibid at (c)
[4] Ibid at (d)
[5] Ibid at (e)
[6] Ibid at (f)
[7] Ibid at (g)
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR737719>
- AGLC
- “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)-Victorian Branch [2022] FWC 131
- Case
- [2022] FWC 131
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to determine if Mr Ristevski met the criteria to hold a right of entry permit. Under the Fair Work Act, Mr Ristevski needed to complete a training course, have no convictions against industrial or other laws, not have been ordered to pay a penalty under any industrial law, and not have had any permit revoked, suspended, or conditioned. The AMWU provided declarations from Mr Ristevski and Mr Tony Mavromatis, the Victorian State Secretary, which supported Mr Ristevski’s eligibility. The declarations included evidence that Mr Ristevski had completed the required training, had no relevant convictions, and had no penalties or conditions on any permits.
The Deputy President found that the information provided by the AMWU was accurate and that Mr Ristevski met the criteria to be a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit. The Deputy President revoked the previous permit issued to Mr Ristevski and ordered a new permit to be issued. The new permit would expire on 15 December 2024.
The court’s decision was that Mr Ristevski was eligible to hold a right of entry permit. The previous permit was revoked and a new permit was issued. This decision resolved the issue of Mr Ristevski’s permit and ensured that he could continue to perform his duties as an official of the AMWU.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.