“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Visy Board Pty Ltd

Case

[2022] FWC 3053

17 NOVEMBER 2022


[2022] FWC 3053

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v

Visy Board Pty Ltd

(B2022/1730)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 17 NOVEMBER 2022

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Visy Board Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Visy Board Pty Ltd (the Respondent).

  1. On 17 November 2022, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Lorraine Cassin of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Mr Anantha Anu of IRIQ Pty Ltd (IRIQ). Mr Anu has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for IRIQ, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that IRIQ is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Anu and IRIQ are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. IRIQ has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Anu and IRIQ are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR748016.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR748015>