“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v The Star Entertainment Qld Limited

Case [2025] FWC 1630


[2025] FWC 1630

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v

The Star Entertainment Qld Limited

(B2025/917)

COMMISSIONER HUNT

BRISBANE, 12 JUNE 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of The Star Entertainment Qld Limited

  1. The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) has made an application to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a protected action ballot order (PABO) in relation to certain employees of The Star Entertainment Qld Limited (the Respondent).

  1. A related application has also been made in relation to employees of the Respondent by the United Workers’ Union.

  1. On 11 June 2025, the Respondent advised that it objected to the application on various grounds and further, sought a period of greater than three working days of notice pursuant to s.414(2) of the Act.   

  1. Directions were issued to the parties on 11 June 2025 to file submissions and witness statements on 12 June 2025, with a hearing to be conducted at 4:00pm on 12 June 2025.   The Respondent largely failed to comply with the directions, other than to copy the Commission into correspondence sent to the AMWU.

  1. At the hearing of the matter, the Respondent withdrew its objections to the application. No evidence was offered in respect of why the notice period should be longer than three working days.  Accordingly, the Commission is not satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice being longer than three working days.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Mr Brett Felsman, AMWU Organiser setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Respondent and confirming that the AMWU has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. I am satisfied that the AMWU has given notice in accordance with s.440 of the Act.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close in the ballot is 26 June 2025. This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and is consequently authorised to conduct the ballot.[1] The scheme of the Act is now that where named in  the  PABO  application  and  proposed  orders,  the  Commission  will,  subject  to  the  Act,  be obliged  to,  in  effect,  appoint  that  eligible  protected  action  ballot  agent  to  conduct  the  ballot concerned.

  1. The Order [PR788155] will be issued concurrently with this Decision.

  1. This matter will be listed for a s.448A conference. An Order and Directions will be issued shortly requiring attendance at the conference.


COMMISSIONER

Appearances:

M Perry and D Peatey for the AMWU.
K Singh and N Brown for the Respondent

Hearing details:

2025.
Brisbane.
12 June.


[1] Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR788156>

Details
AGLC
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v The Star Entertainment Qld Limited [2025] FWC 1630
Case
[2025] FWC 1630
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and The Star Entertainment Qld Limited. The AMWU applied for a protected action ballot order (PABO) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, concerning certain employees of The Star Entertainment Qld Limited. The Respondent, The Star Entertainment Qld Limited, initially objected to the application but subsequently withdrew its objections. The AMWU aimed to conduct a ballot for protected action, a process that requires approval by the Fair Work Commission.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the AMWU had met the requirements for a PABO, particularly in terms of notice and bargaining, as mandated by sections 440 and 443 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Additionally, the Respondent had sought a notice period longer than the statutory three working days, as permitted by section 414(2) of the Act. However, no evidence was presented to justify this longer notice period, leading the Commission to conclude that the standard three-day notice period was sufficient.

The Commission found that the AMWU had fulfilled all necessary conditions for the PABO, including giving appropriate notice and demonstrating genuine efforts to negotiate with The Star Entertainment Qld Limited. Commissioner Hunt determined that the AMWU had complied with all statutory requirements, and the ballot was to be conducted by an approved agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS, which had been authorized under section 468A of the Act. The Commission set the closing date for the ballot as 26 June 2025, and issued an Order to facilitate the ballot process. The matter was scheduled for a section 448A conference to further discuss the implications of the PABO.

The final orders included the issuance of the PABO, with specific details about the ballot process and the appointment of the authorized ballot agent. The Commission also directed that an Order and Directions would be issued for a section 448A conference, ensuring continued engagement on the matter.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.