“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Sydney Trains and NSW Trains

Case [2024] FWC 2113


[2024] FWC 2113

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v

Sydney Trains and NSW Trains

(B2024/1010)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 9 AUGUST 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Sydney Trains and NSW Trains

  1. This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Sydney Trains and NSW Trains (collectively, the Employers).

  1. I note that the Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (ARTBIU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 8 August 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended. I observe that the parties reached an agreement in relation to the provision of extended notice of industrial action that is reflected in the Order made in this matter and consistent with that operating in the related application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Robyn Fortescue, Assistant State Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employers and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with them, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 30 August 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of 7 working days applies to the items listed within Clause 5 of the Order. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR778143.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2024/914.

[2] This is, in effect, 15 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR778144>

Details
AGLC
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Sydney Trains and NSW Trains [2024] FWC 2113
Case
[2024] FWC 2113
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) lodged an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 seeking a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Sydney Trains and NSW Trains. The application was made in the context of negotiations for a proposed enterprise agreement. The AMWU contended that it had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with the employers but had been unsuccessful, necessitating the potential for protected industrial action. The employers did not object to the application, and an agreement was reached regarding the provision of extended notice of industrial action. The matter was determined on the papers without a hearing.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the AMWU had satisfied the requirements for a protected action ballot order under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to ascertain whether the AMWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the employers, and if so, whether exceptional circumstances existed that warranted an extension of the notice period for industrial action. The determination hinged on the evidence provided by the AMWU regarding its bargaining efforts and the specific provisions of the proposed enterprise agreement that necessitated the ballot.

The Deputy President of the Fair Work Commission concluded that the AMWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the employers, as evidenced by the declaration of Robyn Fortescue, Assistant State Secretary, detailing the union's bargaining efforts. The Commission found that all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act had been met. Furthermore, the Commission determined that there were exceptional circumstances that justified an extension of the notice period for industrial action to seven working days, as specified in Clause 5 of the Order. This extension was consistent with the related application made by the Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (ARTBIU). The Commission also set the closing date for the ballot as 30 August 2024.

In summary, the Fair Work Commission granted the AMWU's application for a protected action ballot order. The Commission determined that the union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the employers and that exceptional circumstances justified an extended notice period for industrial action. The ballot will be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), and the matter will proceed to a compulsory conciliation conference to facilitate further negotiations between the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.