| [2025] FWC 2213 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v
Solvay Interox Pty. Ltd.
(B2025/1187)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAUNDERS | NEWCASTLE, 30 JULY 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Solvay Interox Pty. Ltd.
This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Solvay Interox Pty Ltd (Solvay Interox or Employer).
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ray Shortill, Lead Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Solvay Interox, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 13 August 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR790153.
The s.448A compulsory conciliation conference will be held by videoconference using Microsoft Teams at 3:00pm on 7 August 2025. An Order and Directions will be issued requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference, and to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR790152>
- AGLC
- “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Solvay Interox Pty. Ltd [2025] FWC 2213
- Case
- [2025] FWC 2213
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the AMWU had satisfied the statutory requirements for conducting a protected action ballot. This includes demonstrating that the union had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement and that the proposed ballot was necessary. Additionally, the Deputy President had to consider whether the proposed ballot agent, Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, was eligible and authorised to conduct the ballot under the Fair Work Act. The Deputy President also determined the closing date for the ballot and scheduled a compulsory conciliation conference to be held via Microsoft Teams.
Having reviewed the materials, including the declaration by Ray Shortill, the Lead Organiser for the AMWU, who outlined the union's bargaining efforts and commitment to reaching an agreement, the Deputy President found that the union had met all the statutory requirements for conducting the ballot. Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd was confirmed to be an approved ballot agent. The Deputy President set 13 August 2025 as the closing date for the ballot, effectively ten working days from the issuance of the order. Furthermore, the Deputy President scheduled a compulsory conciliation conference for 7 August 2025 to facilitate further negotiations between the parties.
An order was issued allowing the AMWU to proceed with the ballot, with Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd conducting the voting. The order also mandated that all bargaining representatives attend the compulsory conciliation conference on 7 August 2025, prepared to engage in meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.