"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Sikorsky Aircraft Australia Limited T/A Sikorsky Australia

Case [2025] FWC 114


[2025] FWC 114

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v

Sikorsky Aircraft Australia Limited T/A Sikorsky Australia

(B2025/26)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 14 JANUARY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Sikorsky Aircraft Australia Limited T/A Sikorsky Australia

  1. This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Sikorsky Aircraft Australia Limited trading as Sikorsky Australia (Sikorsky or Employer).

  1. On 13 January 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended following discussions between the parties.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Gavin Bubb, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Sikorsky, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 29 January 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of minimum written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of five (5) working days applies to the items listed within Clause 5 of the Order

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR783231.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR783232>

Details
AGLC
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Sikorsky Aircraft Australia Limited T/A Sikorsky Australia [2025] FWC 114
Case
[2025] FWC 114
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission for an order that would permit a ballot of certain employees of Sikorsky Aircraft Australia Limited (trading as Sikorsky Australia) in relation to proposed protected action. Sikorsky did not object to the application, leading the Deputy President to decide to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. The AMWU had provided a declaration by an Organiser setting out the steps taken in bargaining with Sikorsky, and the Deputy President was satisfied that the requirements for such a ballot had been met.

The legal issues before the Deputy President included whether the AMWU had genuinely been trying to reach agreement with Sikorsky, whether the requirements of s.443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 were satisfied, and whether there were relevant exceptional circumstances justifying an extended period of minimum written notice for the proposed industrial action. The Deputy President found that the AMWU had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement and that the requirements of s.443(1) were met. The Deputy President also found that there were relevant exceptional circumstances that justified an extended period of minimum written notice for the proposed industrial action.

The Deputy President issued an order that authorised the AMWU to conduct a ballot of the Sikorsky employees by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). The Deputy President also determined that the date by which voting was to close was 29 January 2025, which was effectively 10 working days from the making of the Order. The Deputy President further found that an extended notice period of five working days applied to the items listed within Clause 5 of the Order. This matter was to be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference.

The Deputy President issued an Order in PR783232 and directed that another Member of the Commission would issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. The Deputy President also indicated that Directions would likely be issued to ensure that the parties attended the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.