| [2024] FWC 1299 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
Progress Rail Australia Pty Ltd
(B2024/557)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 17 MAY 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Progress Rail Australia Pty Ltd
This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Progress Rail Australia Pty Ltd (Progress or Employer).
On 17 May 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Tim Ferguson, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Progress, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 31 May 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR775116.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, ten (10) working days from the date of the Order, as sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
< PR775117>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Progress Rail Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1299
- Case
- [2024] FWC 1299
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues for the Commission to resolve were whether the AMWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Progress Rail Australia Pty Ltd, and if all statutory requirements for conducting the ballot were fulfilled. The AMWU's declaration by Tim Ferguson outlined their efforts in bargaining with the employer, asserting that they had genuinely tried to reach an agreement. The Commission considered these submissions and determined that the notification period for the proposed agreement was valid and that all conditions under section 443(1) of the Act were satisfied. Furthermore, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), the appointed ballot agent, was approved under section 468A of the Act, making it eligible to conduct the ballot.
The Deputy President Hampton concluded that the AMWU met all the necessary criteria for the ballot order. A date for the closure of voting was set as 31 May 2024, effectively ten working days from the issuance of the order. An additional order was issued to mandate the attendance of bargaining representatives for a compulsory conciliation conference, aimed at facilitating meaningful negotiations. The matter was reassigned to another member of the Commission to oversee the conciliation conference and issue further directions if necessary.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.