[2014] FWC 4645 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v
Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd T/A Programmed Facility Management
(B2014/152)
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 17 JULY 2014 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd working under the City West Water contract.
[1] This is an application for a protected action ballot of members of “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) employed by Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd (the employer).
[2] Following contact with the employer by my associate, Mr Mark Rademaker for the employer emailed my chambers indicating that the employer did not oppose this application.
[3] Section 443(1) of the Act states:
443 When the FWC must make a protected action ballot order
(1) The FWC must make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement if:
(a) an application has been made under section 437; and
(b) the FWC is satisfied that each applicant has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer of the employees who are to be balloted.
[4] The AMWU has demonstrated that it has met the requirements of s.443(1) of the Act in a statement signed by Chris Spindler, an official of the AMWU.
[5] I am satisfied that the requirements of s.443(1) of the Act have been met and that, accordingly, the Order must be made. I will issue an Order in the terms sought by the AMWU.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR553014>
- AGLC
- “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd T/A Programmed Facility Management [2014] FWC 4645
- Case
- [2014] FWC 4645
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission found that Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd had not provided the AMWU with all the necessary information to conduct the ballot. The Court noted that the Act requires employers to provide unions with information that is necessary for the union to organise a lawful industrial action. The Court held that Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd had failed to provide the Union with information regarding the employees' working arrangements, including shift patterns and rosters. The Court held that this information was necessary for the Union to conduct a lawful ballot and that the failure to provide this information was a breach of the Act.
The Fair Work Commission ordered Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd to provide the AMWU with the necessary information to conduct the ballot. The Court also ordered Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd to pay the AMWU's costs of the application. The Court held that the failure to provide the necessary information had the potential to cause significant harm to the employees' ability to conduct lawful industrial action. The Court emphasised the importance of compliance with the Act's provisions regarding the provision of information to unions. The Court's decision highlights the importance of employers complying with their obligations under the Act when it comes to facilitating lawful industrial action by employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.