"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v InfraBuild Construction Solutions Pty Ltd T/A InfraBuild Mesh

Case

[2025] FWC 1941

7 JULY 2025


[2025] FWC 1941

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
InfraBuild Construction Solutions Pty Ltd T/A InfraBuild Mesh

(B2025/1097)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 7 JULY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of InfraBuild Construction Solutions Pty Ltd T/A InfraBuild Mesh

  1. This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of InfraBuild Construction Solutions Pty Ltd trading as InfraBuild Mesh (InfraBuild Mesh or Employer).

  1. I note that the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) have made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement.[1]

  1. On 7 July 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer had safety related concerns with seven of the proposed questions set out in clause 5 of the proposed order, and that one of the proposed questions lacked specificity. The AMWU subsequently agreed to amend question 10 of clause 5.

  1. I observe that the parties also agreed for the AMWU to give the following undertaking as part of any subsequent notification of protected industrial action to the Employer:

The AMWU undertakes to ensure that in an emergency situation where there is a risk to personal health and safety and where no other workers are available, AMWU members will be available to perform work. AMWU members will not engage in industrial action that would endanger the life, personal safety, health or welfare of the population or part thereof.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to amend the application to adopt the revised ballot question and otherwise determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Brett Felsman, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with InfraBuild Mesh, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. 

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. 

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 21 July 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. To the extent that InfraBuild Mesh sought that the undertaking referenced earlier be included in the Order to be made by the Commission, I observe that whilst the Commission may accommodate agreed arrangements reached between the parties, there is very limited, if any, scope for the Commission to require any undertakings of this kind.[3] Further, unless they form part of the ballot questions, which must state the question to be put to the employees including the nature of the proposed action,[4] the provisions of s.443 of the Act do not appear to otherwise extend to include such express terms in an order of this kind.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR788974.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter if a Protected Action Ballot Order is granted. To the extent that this matter involves any additional bargaining representatives, that Member will issue an Order requiring their attendance in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. 


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/1093.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

[3] See also Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union v Derwent Valley Council[2025] FWC 1916 at [20] and [21].

[4] Section 443(3)(d) of the Act.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR788975>