"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 2456


[2025] FWC 2456

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v

Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd

(B2025/1317)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 21 AUGUST 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd (Ford or Employer). 

  1. I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement.[1]

  1. On 20 August 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application. 

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. 

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Stephen Fodrocy, Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Ford, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. 

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. 

  1. I observe that the application provided in this matter contained certain observations about the AMWU’s preference in relation to the finalisation of the list of voters. These were not in a form suitable for inclusion in the Order. In that light, I have issued the Order using the Commission’s standard approach without issuing any further directions, noting the role to be played by the Act and associated regulations in the conduct of the ballot. I also observe that the Ballot Agent may have regard to the proposals set out in the application to the extent that they are consistent with the Order and the proper conduct of a ballot of this kind.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 4 September 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR790893

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. 


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/1319

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR790894>

Details
AGLC
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2456
Case
[2025] FWC 2456
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) filed an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order concerning employees of Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd. The application was made to facilitate a vote on a proposed agreement. The Fair Work Commission, represented by Deputy President Hampton, presided over this matter in Adelaide on 21 August 2025. The Commission was informed that Ford did not object to the application, allowing the decision to be made on the papers without a hearing.

The legal issues before the court revolved around whether the AMWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Ford and whether all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act had been fulfilled. The AMWU's declaration by Stephen Fodrocy, the Industrial Officer, was central to this determination. Additionally, the court had to decide on the closing date for voting in the ballot, ensuring it aligned with the 10 working days from the order's issuance, as requested in the application.

The Commission found that the AMWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Ford and that all legislative requirements had been met. Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, approved as a ballot agent, was tasked with conducting the ballot. The court issued an order specifying the closing date for voting as 4 September 2025, effectively establishing the ballot period. The order incorporated the Commission's standard approach to ballot conduct, allowing the ballot agent to consider the AMWU's proposals, provided they were consistent with the order and the proper conduct of the ballot. A separate order was also issued in PR790893, and the matter was assigned to another Commission member for a compulsory conciliation conference.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.