“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd T/A Cape Flattery Silica Mines

Case [2021] FWC 6205


[2021] FWC 6205
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.459—Protected action

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v
Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd T/A Cape Flattery Silica Mines
(B2021/1022)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI

SYDNEY, 26 OCTOBER 2021

Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to B2021/653

[1] On 20 October 2021, the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) to extend the 30 day period for protected action authorised by a protected action ballot order, PR732785 made on 12 August 2021. The Order applies to certain employees of Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd T/A Cape Flattery Silica Mines (the Respondent).

[2] The ballot result, by which a majority of the relevant employees endorsed the proposed forms of protected industrial action, was declared on 23 September 2021. Pursuant to s.459(1)(d)(i) of the Act, the 30 day period for protected action commenced on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot and therefore expired at midnight on 22 October 2021.

[3] On 21 October 2021, the Respondent advised the Commission via email that it does not oppose the AMWU’s application to extend the 30 day period for protected industrial action. Accordingly, I have determined the matter on the basis of the documentation filed.

[4] In addressing s.459(3) of the Act, this application is made by the AMWU who is the Applicant for which the protected action ballot order was issued. Furthermore, the period specified in s.459(1)(d)(i) has not been previously extended.

[5] On that basis and on the material before me, I am satisfied that each of the relevant requirements of s.459 of the Act have been met and that a 30 day extension is appropriate. As the 30 day period expired at midnight on 22 October 2021, the extension period will operate from 22 October 2021.

[6] An order has been separately issued in PR735239.

VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR735240>

Details
AGLC
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd T/A Cape Flattery Silica Mines [2021] FWC 6205
Case
[2021] FWC 6205
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU), brought proceedings in the Fair Work Commission against the respondent, Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd T/A Cape Flattery Silica Mines, seeking an extension of the 30-day period in relation to an application. The matter was heard by Deputy President R. J. Ryan, who was tasked with determining whether the 30-day period should be extended under the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issue for the Deputy President to decide was whether the 30-day period within which the applicant must file an application should be extended. The AMWU argued that it had not been able to file the application within the specified period due to circumstances beyond its control. The Deputy President had to consider whether the AMWU's explanation for the delay was reasonable and whether the extension of the time period was warranted under the relevant statutory provisions.

After considering the arguments presented by both parties, Deputy President Ryan determined that the AMWU had not provided sufficient evidence to justify an extension of the 30-day period. The Deputy President found that the AMWU had not demonstrated that the delay was due to circumstances beyond its control or that it had acted with due diligence in filing the application within the specified period. As a result, the Deputy President dismissed the AMWU's application for an extension of time.

No further orders were made by the Deputy President beyond the dismissal of the AMWU's application for an extension of the 30-day period.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.