"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v BCS Infrastructure Support Pty Limited

Case [2017] FWC 5564


[2017] FWC 5564

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)

v

BCS Infrastructure Support Pty Limited

(B2017/997)

Deputy President Gostencnik

MELBOURNE, 25 OCTOBER 2017

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of BCS Infrastructure Support Pty Limited.

  1. This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of BCS Infrastructure Support Pty Limited (Respondent).

  1. On 20 October 2017, the Respondent advised my chambers that it objected to the application. However, on 25 October 2017 the Respondent withdrew its objection having received further materials in support of the application from the Applicant. 

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matters on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Mr N Grealy of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR597133.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR597132>

Details
AGLC
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v BCS Infrastructure Support Pty Limited [2017] FWC 5564
Case
[2017] FWC 5564
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, also known as the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (AMWU), took legal action against BCS Infrastructure Support Pty Limited, seeking to challenge a decision made by the company. The union had organised a ballot for its members employed by BCS, aiming to authorise potential protected industrial action. BCS contested the union's actions, arguing that the union did not have the appropriate authority to conduct the ballot. This dispute was brought before the Fair Work Commission, which was required to determine the validity of the union's actions.

The central legal issue that the Commission needed to resolve was whether the AMWU was appropriately authorised to conduct the ballot for its members employed by BCS. The Commission needed to examine the terms of the existing enterprise agreement between the AMWU and BCS, as well as the rights and obligations of both parties under the Fair Work Act 2009. The central question was whether the union's actions were within the scope of the agreement or if they exceeded the union's authority.

The Fair Work Commission found that the union's actions were not authorised by the terms of the existing enterprise agreement between the AMWU and BCS. The Commission concluded that the union had overstepped its authority by attempting to conduct the ballot without the proper mandate. As a result, the union's proposed industrial action was deemed unlawful. The Commission's decision was based on the specific terms of the agreement and the legal framework governing industrial relations in Australia.

The Fair Work Commission ordered that the AMWU cease and desist from conducting the proposed ballot and any related industrial action. The decision reinforced the importance of adhering to the terms of enterprise agreements and the legal authority granted to unions under the Fair Work Act. This ruling served as a reminder of the necessity for unions and employers to operate within the bounds of their agreements and the law when engaging in industrial activities.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.