| [2024] FWC 2042 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
Alstom Transport Australia Pty Limited
(B2024/967)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 1 AUGUST 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Alstom Transport Australia Pty Limited
This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Alstom Transport Australia Pty Limited (Alstom or Employer).
I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 31 July 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended. However, it raised certain concerns that have been considered by the Commission.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Nathan Everson, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Alstom, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
Alstom raised concerns about the uncertainty of the actual ballot period in the draft order and its length. In this regard, I observe that it is CiVS, as the ballot agent, that sets the timetable for the commencement of the ballot. However, the Commission establishes the date by which the ballot is to close.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 16 August 2024. This is, in effect, 10 working days from the date of the order. I consider that this date will permit the ballot to conducted as expeditiously as practical, which is the criteria established by the Act.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR777745.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2024/969.
[2] See s.444(3)(c) of the Act as considered in CEPU v Nilsen (NSW) Pty Ltd[2023] FWCFB 134.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR777746>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Alstom Transport Australia Pty Limited [2024] FWC 2042
- Case
- [2024] FWC 2042
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the AMWU had met the requirements for a protected action ballot order under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the notification period for the proposed enterprise agreement was correctly identified, if the AMWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Alstom, and if the proposed ballot period was reasonable. Additionally, the Commission had to consider Alstom's concerns about the uncertainty and length of the ballot period.
The Commission found that the AMWU had met all the requirements for a protected action ballot order. It was satisfied that the AMWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Alstom and that the notification period for the proposed enterprise agreement was correctly identified. The Commission established the ballot closing date as 16 August 2024, allowing for the ballot to be conducted as expeditiously as practical. This date was deemed reasonable and met the criteria set out in the Act. The Commission noted that the actual ballot period was determined by the ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), but the closing date was set by the Commission.
The Fair Work Commission issued an Order approving the protected action ballot order for the AMWU. The ballot was to be conducted by CiVS, which had been approved as an eligible ballot agent. The Commission also set the closing date for the ballot as 16 August 2024, which was 10 working days from the date of the order. This decision ensured that the ballot could be conducted promptly and in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.