| [2022] FWC 132 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.512—Right of entry
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) - New South Wales Branch
(RE2021/1337)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 28 JANUARY 2022 |
Application for a right of entry permit for Cory Mathew Wright – permit previously issued - permit never received – order revoking missing permit – permit reissued.
The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) applied under s.512 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for the issue of a right of entry permit to its official, Mr Cory Mathew Wright. The Commission subsequently issued Mr Wright a right of entry permit which will expire on 21 December 2024.
Mr Wright’s permit is one of the 37 missing entry permits referred to in decision [2022] FWC 123. As indicated in that decision, in order for Mr Wright to hold a valid entry permit, the missing permit must be revoked and a permit must be reissued. In order to issue a permit to Mr Wright, I need to be satisfied that he is a fit and proper person to hold a permit under the Act taking into account the permit qualification matters. The relevant statutory considerations set out in [2022] FWC 123 are adopted here and need not be repeated.
Consideration
In support of its application the AMWU filed declarations by Mr Wright and Ms Robyn Fortescue, Assistant State Secretary (the Declarations).
Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f)
According to the Declarations:
· Mr Wright has received appropriate training about the rights and responsibilities of a permit holder by undertaking a course of training on the subject of a federal right of entry conducted on 7 July 2021 (s.513(1)(a) of the Act));[1]
· Mr Wright has never been convicted of an offence against an industrial law (s.513(1)(b) of the Act);[2]
· Mr Wright has never been convicted of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, State, Territory or a foreign country, involving conduct described in s.513(1)(c) of the Act;[3]
· Neither Mr Wright nor any other person has been ordered to pay a penalty under this Act or any other industrial law in relation to action taken by him (s.513(1)(d) of the Act);[4]
· Mr Wright has not had any entry permit issued under Part 3-4 of the Act or a similar law of the Commonwealth revoked, suspended or had imposed conditions on any such permit (s.513(1)(e) of the Act);[5]
· Mr Wright has not had cancelled, suspended or imposed conditions on any right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes that Mr Wright held under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(i) of the Act);[6] and
· Mr Wright has not been disqualified from exercising or applying for a right of entry permit for industrial or occupational health and safety purposes under a State or Territory industrial law or a State or Territory occupational health and safety law (s.513(1)(f)(ii) of the Act).[7]
I accept that the information disclosed in the Declarations concerning these matters is accurate and correct. These matters weigh in favour of a conclusion that Mr Wright is a fit and proper person to hold a right of entry permit.
Permit qualification matters – s.513(1)(g)
There are no other matters of which I am aware that I consider relevant to the determination of whether Mr Wright is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.
Conclusion
Pursuant to s.603 of the Act, the entry permit formerly issued to Mr Wright by decision of the delegate is revoked with effect from the date of this decision. A revocation order is separately issued in PR737825.
Taking in account the permit qualification matters, for the reasons earlier stated I am satisfied that Mr Wright is a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit.
A permit will be reissued to Mr Wright separately.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Form F42, Declaration by proposed permit holder dated 3 December 2021 at (a) and ACTU Certificate of Completion dated 7 July 2021
[2] Ibid at (b)
[3] Ibid at (c)
[4] Ibid at (d)
[5] Ibid at (e)
[6] Ibid at (f)
[7] Ibid at (g)
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR737720>
- AGLC
- “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) - New South Wales Branch [2022] FWC 132
- Case
- [2022] FWC 132
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues central to this case revolved around the validity and enforceability of a permit that had been issued but never received by the intended recipient. The court needed to determine whether the original permit could be revoked due to its absence and whether a new permit could be issued in its place. The AMWU argued that the permit should be revoked and reissued to ensure clarity and compliance with relevant regulations.
The court, after reviewing the circumstances, found that the permit in question was indeed validly issued but had not been received by Wright. Given the missing permit, the court decided to revoke the original permit. Furthermore, the court found it appropriate to reissue the permit to ensure that Wright had the necessary documentation to carry out his duties without legal impediments. The court concluded that the revocation and reissuance of the permit were necessary to maintain compliance with the relevant regulations.
The court ordered the revocation of the missing permit and the reissuance of a new permit to Cory Mathew Wright, effective immediately. The AMWU was directed to ensure that the new permit was delivered to Wright without further delay. This decision aimed to rectify the situation and provide clarity regarding Wright's employment status and the necessary documentation required for his role.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.