[2013] FWCA 1884 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
(AG2013/649)
CUSTOM COACHES (SALES) PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Vehicle industry | |
COMMISSIONER CARGILL | SYDNEY, 28 MARCH 2013 |
Application for approval of the Custom Coaches (Sales) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Custom Coaches (Sales) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) on behalf of Custom Coaches (Sales) Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The AMWU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 4 April 2013. The nominal expiry date is 30 June 2013.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE400492 PR535197>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) [2013] FWCA 1884
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1884
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the FWC were whether the agreement was a "good faith" bargaining tool, and if it appropriately covered the terms and conditions of employment for workers classified as contractors. The FWC had to consider the nature of the work performed by the employees and whether the agreement provided adequate protections and benefits in line with the principles of fairness and equity.
The FWC examined the evidence presented by both parties and found that the agreement demonstrated genuine efforts to negotiate in good faith. It determined that the classification of the employees as contractors was valid based on the specific work arrangements. However, the FWC identified several areas where the agreement did not sufficiently protect the employees' rights and conditions. Consequently, the FWC made orders to amend the agreement to ensure it met the legal standards for fairness and compliance with the Act. The FWC's decision balanced the need for flexibility in employment arrangements with the protection of employees' rights.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.